Congratulations on a stylish and very handy product.
Ralf Junker wrote:
Hello,
the new SQLiteSpy 1.5.1 has just been released. SQLiteSpy is a single-exe
database manager for SQLite with the complete SQLite library already build in.
SQLiteSpy is the ideal tool for developers as well as custome
Cool. When will you release a MacOS X version?
-ken
On 2-Feb-06, at 7:58 AM, Ralf Junker wrote:
Hello,
the new SQLiteSpy 1.5.1 has just been released. SQLiteSpy is a
single-exe database manager for SQLite with the complete SQLite
library already build in. SQLiteSpy is the ideal tool for
SQLiteSpy is a very nice looking application.
I'm not sure if this is a good feature, though:
Built in SQLite Engine
SQLiteSpy comes as a single file executable with
the SQLite database engine already build into the
application. There is no need to distribute any DLLs,
which makes SQLi
Hello Ken & Deb Allen,
>Cool. When will you release a MacOS X version?
There will be no native MacOS X version of SQLiteSpy, I'm afraid. SQLiteSpy
delveloped for Win32 only, but maybe there are ways to run Win32 executables on
MacOS X, like it is possible with Linux using the Wine Windows Emula
Hello Joe Wilson,
the build-in database engine is a much praised feature of SQLiteSpy. It
simplifies the life of many users, and mine as well, since there can be no
incompatabilities with wrong DLLs and versions.
I am sorry that you can not use SQLiteSpy with your custom DLL. Maybe you would
l
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Junker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 February 2006 10:12
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] ANN: SQLiteSpy 1.5.1 released
> I am sorry that you can not use SQLiteSpy with your custom
> DLL. Maybe you wou
At 04:21 03/02/2006, you wrote:
SQLiteSpy is a very nice looking application.
I'm not sure if this is a good feature, though:
Built in SQLite Engine
SQLiteSpy comes as a single file executable with
the SQLite database engine already build into the
application. There is no need to distrib
Whether to use an external DLL or have the functionality embedded?
I have a both-ways compromise. I store a copy of the DLL inside the app as a
resource. Then if the DLL doesn't extst in the app dir I copy the DLL out,
but this also allows me to update the DLL to something more recent by
replacing
My dozen or so custom SQLite functions are not useful to
anyone else, as they are very specific to my application's data.
(Never mind the fact that they would not be accepted by DRH anyway).
I commonly swap different sqlite3.dll versions in and out
between runs while using Mike Cariotoglou's (ex
Hi ,
Can I download SQLiteSpy some other link. It seems my ISP has some
issues connecting to the site. Much better if someone can e-mail me
SQLiteSpy straight away.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vishal Kashyap
http://vishal.net.in
On 2/2/06, Ralf Junker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the
In general there are advantages and disadvantages about static linking
of dll's.
Major advantage is that if it works, you don't have to bother about dll's. But
if you have more app's using the database then it might be a disadvantage. I
like to use same version with all my apps and use a central
Hello Joe Wilson,
I want to thank you and everybody else to share their thoughts on SQLiteSpy and
let you know that I very much value your feedback. I initially wrote SQLiteSpy
for my own personal needs only, but it has since then certainly improved thanks
to the responses I have received by ma
That's great! Looking forward to it.
--- Ralf Junker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Joe Wilson,
>
> I want to thank you and everybody else to share their thoughts on SQLiteSpy
> and let you know
> that I very much value your feedback. I initially wrote SQLiteSpy for my own
> personal needs
On 2/3/06, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I commonly swap different sqlite3.dll versions in and out
> between runs while using Mike Cariotoglou's (excellent)
> SqliteExplorer and have no difficulty at all. I'm not sure
> why others have such problems will DLLs.
DRH does a good job testing
of the wrappers that embed the
engine.
Just a thought,
Steve
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Ralf Junker
Sent: 03 February 2006 10:12
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [RBL] Re: [sqlite] ANN: SQLiteSpy 1.5.1 released
Hello Joe W
roblem with quite a few of the wrappers
> that embed the
> engine.
>
> Just a thought,
>
> Steve
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> org] On Behalf Of Ralf Junker
> Sent: 03 February 2006 10:12
> To: sql
- Original Message -
From: "Steve O'Hara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SqliteSpy is a nice tool but this is a weakness, not a strength - we
used to call this sort of thing "built-in obsolescence". Woudn't it be
better for you if you didn't have to track changes made by Richard to
the engine?
T
riginal Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Ralf Junker
Sent: 03 February 2006 10:12
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [RBL] Re: [sqlite] ANN: SQLiteSpy 1.5.1 released
Hello Joe Wilson,
the build-in database engine is a much praised feature of SQLiteSpy.
18 matches
Mail list logo
