On 25 Feb 2014, at 4:31am, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
does generate a plan with only one execution of each correlated subquery, but
does not give me access to the intermediate results
You might experiment with creating a view for the subquery instead of for the
query as a
All,
I am using System.Data.SQLite with a relatively uncommon
language called VEE. This is an interpreted language that
runs in a 32bit development/runtime environment.
My application works fine when run on an internal or USB
thumb drive. However, if I try running it from a network
drive
Hi,
I would like to add check constraint for existing database. Is it
possible?
for ex:
create table emp(id integer primary key autoincrement,
fullname,fathername,mothername as text);
insert into emp(fullname,fathername,mothername) values(a,b,c);
insert into
d b wrote:
I would like to add check constraint for existing database. Is it
possible?
SQLite has no built-in function (such as ALTER TABLE) to do this.
However, if you want to do a change that does not affect how the table's
data is stored in the database file, then you can change the table
On Monday, 24 February, 2014 21:53, mm.w 0xcafef...@gmail.com said:
I don't want to be annoying but why nowadays people are
sub-abusing-sub-selecting instead of using JOINs? moreover, that is in
most cases faster (a lot) and certainly more Human Readable.
Neither JOIN nor LEFT JOIN will work in
I am seeing what I think may be buggy behaviour, using a recent sqlite
packaged by debian:
3.8.3.1 2014-02-11 14:52:19 ea3317a4803d71d88183b29f1d3086f46d68a00e
What I am seeing is too few rows returned from a UNION ALL query.
I can break it down as follows.
Query 1 on its own works fine,
Can you please send the database schema, and possibly some test data?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Mark Lawrence no...@null.net wrote:
I am seeing what I think may be buggy behaviour, using a recent sqlite
packaged by debian:
3.8.3.1 2014-02-11 14:52:19
On Tue Feb 25, 2014 at 09:37:41AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
Can you please send the database schema, and possibly some test data?
Attached is an SQL file containing enough to reproduce the issue on my
system:
* Schema for the tables
* Rows for the tables
* 4 queries demonstrating
On 25 Feb 2014, at 4:24pm, Mark Lawrence no...@null.net wrote:
Attached
Sorry, but you can't attach files to posts to this list. We don't want
everyone sending us their homework. Could you email directly or put the files
on a server somewhere ?
Simon.
This mailing list strips attachments. Please include the SQL text in-line.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Mark Lawrence no...@null.net wrote:
On Tue Feb 25, 2014 at 09:37:41AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
Can you please send the database schema, and possibly some test data?
Attached is
On Tue Feb 25, 2014 at 05:24:55PM +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On Tue Feb 25, 2014 at 09:37:41AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
Can you please send the database schema, and possibly some test data?
Attached is an SQL file containing enough to reproduce the issue on my
system:
Righto, now
Hi! Given this schema:
create table q (id integer primary key, idLevel integer);
create table level (id integer primary key);
insert into q values(1, 1);
insert into q values(2, 1);
insert into q values(3, 1);
insert into level values(1);
When running this query:
select p.* FROM
q as p
inner
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Mark Lawrence no...@null.net wrote:
Righto, now included *inline* is the following:
* Schema for the tables
* Rows for the tables
* 4 queries demonstrating the issue:
1. Single SELECT query #1
2. Single SELECT query #2
Hello,
thank you for your reply, that works for me. To give a context and a
background; my comment was implying a change of design by adding an
abstraction layer between the data and the representation, a change of
raw-data storage with the support of a middle-man-linker e.g async data
events,
The ticket is http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/8c63ff0eca
The problem is that in the virtual machine that SQLite uses, a pair
of concurrent co-routines (one for each of the two SELECTs in the
UNION ALL) are both trying to use the same temporary register at the
same time. Bummer.
Yep,
William Drago wrote:
I am using System.Data.SQLite with a relatively uncommon
language called VEE. This is an interpreted language that
runs in a 32bit development/runtime environment.
I've never heard of this language before; however, it sounds
like it hosts the CLR within its process?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Mark Lawrence no...@null.net wrote:
If you manage to determine some
kind of work-around for the condition occuring I'd appreciate hearing
about it
No work-around, yet. There is a patch online (
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/cc5eda5422) that should always
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 PM, nobre nobr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Given this schema:
create table q (id integer primary key, idLevel integer);
create table level (id integer primary key);
insert into q values(1, 1);
insert into q values(2, 1);
insert into q values(3, 1);
insert into
18 matches
Mail list logo
