If I configure LMS to use a single artist list, then "Various Artists"
is placed at the top of the list. But, if I use 2 seperate lists,
"Various Artists" is placed under "V" in the "Album Artists" list. Is
there a way to have "Various Artists" placed at the top of "Album
Artists" when using 2 ar
cpd73 wrote:
> If I configure LMS to use a single artist list, then "Various Artists"
> is placed at the top of the list. But, if I use 2 seperate lists,
> "Various Artists" is placed under "V" in the "Album Artists" list.
Isnt it the other way?
I use single list and "Various Artists" is place
DJanGo wrote:
> Isnt it the other way?
>
> I use single list and "Various Artists" is placed under "V"
Not for me. I've just checked with the default web UI. Single list => VA
at top. Split lists, VA in middle. But, eitherway it should be
consistent, no?
-
cpd73 wrote:
> Not for me. I've just checked with the default web UI. Single list => VA
> at top. Split lists, VA in middle. But, eitherway it should be
> consistent, no?I use a single list and see Various Artists at the top.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
---
slartibartfast wrote:
> I use a single list and see Various Artists at the top.
>
> Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
If you have tagged an album with an AlbumArtist as VA then youll see it
in the middle. By default if you leave AlbumArtist blank then LMS will
treat it consistently IIRC
d6jg wrote:
> If you have tagged an album with an AlbumArtist as VA then youll see it
> in the middle. By default if you leave AlbumArtist blank then LMS will
> treat it consistently IIRC
Ah! I -think- the issue is caused by the "Compilations" setting. If set
to "Group together", then VA appear
I think you're making it too hard on yourself, which results in these
inconsistencies. I'd advise to just return what LMS gives without
forcing any other "logic" on it. An example why I would say that: I've
disabled the "Compilation" feature, I have not one single album tagged
with "Various Artis
bakker_be wrote:
> I think you're making it too hard on yourself, which results in these
> inconsistencies. I'd advise to just return what LMS gives without
> forcing any other "logic" on it. An example why I would say that: I've
> disabled the "Compilation" feature, I have not one single album
Hi, after years of squeezeboxes running stably over a mixed wired,
homeplug wired network I've started to get really bad stutters in
playback. Basically it will run fine for several tracks, and then go
into stutter mode. Sometimes it sorts itself out - other times we have
to clear the playlist an
mherger wrote:
> Your dated LMS doesn't support streaming over https. You should update
> to 7.7.6 or 7.9.x.
Interesting. I have been listening to that stream for years until just
now. Just trying to get back to normal.
---
lbunch wrote:
> Interesting. I have been listening to that stream for years until just
> now. Just trying to get back to normal.
I am running a 2012 Vortexbox, v2.2:
Kernel Version 3.6.5-2.fc16.i686.PAE (SMP)
Distro Name Fedora release 16 (Verne)
Processors 4
Model Intel(R) Atom
lbunch wrote:
> I am running a 2012 Vortexbox, v2.2:
> Kernel Version3.6.5-2.fc16.i686.PAE (SMP)
> Distro NameFedora release 16 (Verne)
>
> Processors4
> Model Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510 @ 1.66GHz
> CPU Speed 1.67 GHz
> Cache Size512.00 KB
> System Bogomips 13301.4
mherger wrote:
Your dated LMS doesn't support streaming over https. You should update
to 7.7.6 or 7.9.x.
Interesting. I have been listening to that stream for years until just
now. Just trying to get back to normal.
Many stations are changing from streaming over http to https recently.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
