mherger wrote:
> > It seems like I have Perl 5.18, 5.28 and 5.30 installed on my HDD but
> > when typing Perl -v I get the respons 5.28. So there might be
> something
> > in it that LMS is picking the wrong version for some reason.
>
> Please do the tests I posted in #50.
>
> --
>
> Michael
Attached is the serverlog.
Could you please provide the scanner.log, too?
I am trying to finish the scan in High, not maximum performance.
Oh... that means that the previous scanner.log is lost... what a pity :-(
Mem: 983680K used, 15360K free, 119872K shrd, 1320K buff, 327964K
cached
"u
mherger wrote:
> > What about the scan logs? they are set to error right now, is this
> ok?
>
> Yes, they're mostly helpful to know whether a file is causing problems.
>
> But in your case I'm more interested in more lower level issues, like
> eg. in the database use.
>
> > And a complete cl
Thanks Kidstypike !
I didn't realise I had this plugin installed, I did a clean install
trying to find another problem and didn't reinstall it !
The "Gain" display is the default when this plugin is installed
Thanks again
Jeff
*Want a webapp ?* Get SqueezeLite-X !
https://forums.slimdevice
Jeff07971 wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked and answered somewhere else, if it has I
> couldn't find it.
>
> At some point between LMS versions 7.9.x and 8.0.x the volume display on
> the screen on my 3 SB3's changed from a horizontal bar to a written db
> reading IE "-35 db"
>
> I think t
Sorry if this has been asked and answered somewhere else, if it has I
couldn't find it.
At some point between LMS versions 7.9.x and 8.0.x the volume display on
the screen on my 3 SB3's changed from a horizontal bar to a written db
reading IE "-35 db"
I think that it was the change from 7.9 to
It seems like I have Perl 5.18, 5.28 and 5.30 installed on my HDD but
when typing Perl -v I get the respons 5.28. So there might be something
in it that LMS is picking the wrong version for some reason.
Please do the tests I posted in #50.
--
Michael
___
mherger wrote:
> > The solution is somewhat rude, but what you need to do is delete all
> > files from the LMS `lib` and `CPAN` folders for which an equally
> named
> > file exists in your system's Perl vendor path (for version 5.28 that
> > would typically be /usr/lib/perl/vendor_perl/5.28).
>
In the end it was much easier than I thought :-). Weird, I thought I
had tried this previously, but must have gotten something wrong.
Still just using the Container Station GUI - I created a new container
from the image, this time in the "Advanced Settings" section, I added a
new environment v
jelockwood wrote:
> It is currently working after updating to LMS 8.0.0
>
> Thanks also to the replies I noticed that my mysqueezebox.com favourites
> are all defined as http and not https URLs. However I am confident that
> is not the main issue as the same problem happened when using the Tune
mherger wrote:
> > What about the scan logs? they are set to error right now, is this
> ok?
>
> Yes, they're mostly helpful to know whether a file is causing problems.
>
> But in your case I'm more interested in more lower level issues, like
> eg. in the database use.
>
> > And a complete cl
The solution is somewhat rude, but what you need to do is delete all
files from the LMS `lib` and `CPAN` folders for which an equally named
file exists in your system's Perl vendor path (for version 5.28 that
would typically be /usr/lib/perl/vendor_perl/5.28).
No, please don't recommend doing th
jritsval wrote:
> Seems like I'm running Perl 5.28 on my Mac. Read somewhere that LMS only
> runs on 5.18 and that Perl is nog backward compatible. Anyone that can
> confirm this is the problem? And how do I proceed with uninstalling and
> installing Perl?
> I have not, to my knowledge, installe
OUCH! Bad news!
Thanks again for pointing me in the right direction.
mherger wrote:
> >
> Yeah, Synology discontinued support for LMS :-(
>
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=111876
>
> --
>
> Michael
---
Thanks. I will check the Synology thread. But as far as I see there is
no update available in the synology third party apps (package center).
(Maybe the thread answers this)
Yeah, Synology discontinued support for LMS :-(
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=111876
--
Michael
__
It is currently working after updating to LMS 8.0.0
Thanks also to the replies I noticed that my mysqueezebox.com favourites
are all defined as http and not https URLs. However I am confident that
is not the main issue as the same problem happened when using the TuneIn
app to browse to the same
Thanks. I will check the Synology thread. But as far as I see there is
no update available in the synology third party apps (package center).
(Maybe the thread answers this)
mherger wrote:
> > Today I noticed that my favourite plugins (Bandcamp, Spotty, Mixcloud)
> > are not accessible anymore.
Thanks for the responses.
This particular computer is kept on Windows 7 as it is also used to run
Windows Media Centre. I may however at some stage setup a new NAS and
move LMS to that.
I have just updated to LMS 8.0.0 and it shows IO::Socket::SSL is 2.0.68
It is indeed possible the built-in W
Today I noticed that my favourite plugins (Bandcamp, Spotty, Mixcloud)
are not accessible anymore. (I'm using LMS 7.9.1 on Synology NAS).
Please update your LMS. It's https support is lacking. See the Synology
related thread in this forum.
--
Michael
_
What about the scan logs? they are set to error right now, is this ok?
Yes, they're mostly helpful to know whether a file is causing problems.
But in your case I'm more interested in more lower level issues, like
eg. in the database use.
And a complete clear and rescan is what we want, righ
Today I noticed that my favourite plugins (Bandcamp, Spotty, Mixcloud)
are not accessible anymore. (I'm using LMS 7.9.1 on Synology NAS).
When checking the plugins page, I see
-"Bad repository http://repos.squeezecommunity.org/extensions.xml -
Redirection limit exceeded"-
Also, there's no chec
gharris999 wrote:
> Peter: I'm a long-time user of your PowerCenter plugin. But several
> years ago I moved from using the serial interfaced CM11A and CM17A to
> the USB connected CM15A and CM19A USB x10 transceivers. I've created a
> simple heyu.sh bash script that redirects PowerCenter heyu
mherger wrote:
> > Yes i can do that, a complete delete and rescan everything?
>
> SSH in to the device
> (https://docs.picoreplayer.org/how-to/access_pcp_via_ssh/), run "top".
> The top line would give you something like this:
>
> Mem: 222824K used, 775996K free, 13088K shrd, 17652K buff, 6
Yes i can do that, a complete delete and rescan everything?
SSH in to the device
(https://docs.picoreplayer.org/how-to/access_pcp_via_ssh/), run "top".
The top line would give you something like this:
Mem: 222824K used, 775996K free, 13088K shrd, 17652K buff, 68236K cached
Just try to see w
open up a shell and run the command `top`
32562
watch the MiB Mem: line.
+---+
|Filename: 12-18-2020 9-36-55 AM.png|
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=32562|
+---
mherger wrote:
> >> You could also enable INFO logging for database.info
> >> (Settings/Advanced/Logging) before re-running a scan with max memory
> >> mode. That would give us some information about what's going on
> without
> >> modifying the code. Do NOT set the log level to DEBUG, as this cou
You could also enable INFO logging for database.info
(Settings/Advanced/Logging) before re-running a scan with max memory
mode. That would give us some information about what's going on without
modifying the code. Do NOT set the log level to DEBUG, as this could
create a huge scanner.log!
Well,
Seems like I'm running Perl 5.28 on my Mac. Read somewhere that LMS only
runs on 5.18 and that Perl is nog backward compatible. Anyone that can
That's why I was wondering about slimserver.pl's head: it should
explicitely refer to perl5.18
confirm this is the problem? And how do I proceed wit
Yes. They are using a LPAE in the kernels
piCorePlayer a small player for the Raspberry Pi in RAM.
Homepage: https://www.picoreplayer.org
Please 'donate'
(https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=U7JHY5WYHCNRU&lc=GB¤cy_code=USD&bn=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donateCC_LG%2egi
paul- wrote:
> pCP 32 bit will use all memory of the rpi4 boards,
even the 8Gb boards ?
bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=
pCP 32 bit will use all memory of the rpi4 boards, but its 3GB per
process. (2GB in practicality with overhead) There is however a full
64bit pCP that doesn't have these restrictions.
pCP7 is in beta now, I'm waiting for a few kernel fixes from RPI (for
some fridge case uses - not normal LMS/s
mherger wrote:
> > Just under 100k
>
> 143MB for 100k. OP has about double that number, or more. Which means
> the file _could_ be 300MB.
>
> It's possible that this really is very close to fitting the condition I
>
> came up with at some point to decide over running in memory or not. I
> gu
jritsval wrote:
> Yes I have Michael so I believe that Rosetta is installed. Still fail to
> load something that I cannot figure out what it is
>
> "The following modules failed to load: EV JSON::XS YAML::XS"
>
> And after this failure LMS exits.
>
> Do you know what the above means?
>
> Bes
357.6M library.db
Yeah, this could really be just a bit too much for in-memory
optimization, but not large enough to trigger my condition. Please see
my previous response to Paul.
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slim
Just under 100k
143MB for 100k. OP has about double that number, or more. Which means
the file _could_ be 300MB.
It's possible that this really is very close to fitting the condition I
came up with at some point to decide over running in memory or not. I
guess LMS tries to optimize in memor
mherger wrote:
> > I will observe my existing PI three, and check if it is running
> stable.
> > A full rescan is not necessary very often, and I like the fact that
> the
> > PI three uses less energy than the PI four, but if there should be
> any
> > problems again, I think I might buy a PI fou
Do you know what the above means?
Yes: the wrong Perl is being used. Either wrong version (not Perl 5.18),
or wrong architecture.
What gives:
head -n1
/Library/PreferencePanes/Squeezebox.prefPane/Contents/server/slimserver.pl
And:
SETARCH="arch -x86_64" perl5.18 -V
--
Michael
_
mherger wrote:
> > Ran the above one liner and got this response
>
> I'm sorry, I forgot the most important part of it...
>
> SETARCH="arch -x86_64"
> /Library/PreferencePanes/Squeezebox.prefPane/Contents/server/slimserver.pl
>
> --d_startup
>
> We must tell it to use the x86_64 emulation (
mherger wrote:
> > I don't know how to describe it any better. Maybe some screenshots
> can
> > help illustrate the problem: 'link' (https://we.tl/t-hfWzS2pxtQ).
> > The browse menus in the screenshots are created by the Ratings Light
> > plugin but the artists menu from Additional Browse Modes
Just under 100k
Slightly special case though as many are the result of .cue files
splitting multi-hour radio shows into tracks.
Paul Webster
http://dabdig.blogspot.com
author of \"now playing\" plugins covering radio france (fip etc), kcrw,
supla finland, abc australia, cbc/radio-canada and rt
143614976 Dec 18 10:10 /usr/local/slimserver/Cache/library.db
How many tracks would that be?
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter
Just for comparison ... mine (which scans without a problem on a
Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 with 1GB memory)
Code:
537112576 Dec 18 09:59 /usr/local/slimserver/Cache/cache.db
36725760 Dec 18 10:10 /usr/local/slimserver/Cache/persist.db
143614976 Dec 18 10:10 /usr
I forgot Pi3 was only 1Gb.
mherger wrote:
> Would the 2GB limit be per process or overall?
I don't use PCP (yet), so my "advice" was based on what I think I read
in pcp threads.
I think there are two issues - Perl pointers (check using perl
-V:ptrsize ) and 64 bit OS kernel address.
Multiple
I will observe my existing PI three, and check if it is running stable.
A full rescan is not necessary very often, and I like the fact that the
PI three uses less energy than the PI four, but if there should be any
problems again, I think I might buy a PI four.
Could you please still tell me the
I will observe my existing PI three, and check if it is running stable.
A full rescan is not necessary very often, and I like the fact that the
PI three uses less energy than the PI four, but if there should be any
problems again, I think I might buy a PI four.
Thank you
Pommes
The Earth Has M
You should check on the PCP thread but IIRC I think because of 32 bit
legacy (which may change) LMS cannot use more than 2Gb.
2GB is already twice the 1GB of a Pi3 - which is a lot more ;-).
So on a pure LMS/PCP no point to 8Gb or possibly 4Gb.
Would the 2GB limit be per process or overall?
Pommes wrote:
> if the PI four would be of advantage here.
Pi4 has faster processor, better network and USB interfaces - so
performance will improve.
You should check on the PCP thread but IIRC I think because of 32 bit
legacy (which may change) LMS cannot use more than 2Gb.
So on a pure LMS
Ran the above one liner and got this response
I'm sorry, I forgot the most important part of it...
SETARCH="arch -x86_64"
/Library/PreferencePanes/Squeezebox.prefPane/Contents/server/slimserver.pl
--d_startup
We must tell it to use the x86_64 emulation (Rosetta). Have you run any
other x86
mherger wrote:
> > However this does not work for me. I have a brand new MacBook Air with
> a
> > M1 processor and 16 Gig of RAM. When I try to start LMS it tries to
> > start for a second or so and then stops. It have never worked. Have
> all
> > the symptoms described above.
>
> Please run th
Could you please let me know where to check the size of the DB? I could
check the size tonight and then post it here.
It's in the cache folder. See Settings/Information in LMS.
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slimdevices
mherger wrote:
> > My library is not giant, itâs monstrous. Over 200,000 tracks, a lot
> of
> > spoken word, loops and samples, though. I did change the performance
> > setting from maximum to high, and now the scanning went through
> without
> > a problem.
> > It took a couple of hours, but no
51 matches
Mail list logo
