Malmis wrote:
> I had the same problem after upgrading to ubuntu 22.04 but the 8.3
> version solves the problem:
>
> (URL redacted)
I also could not get the build procedure to work. I had 8.0 already
installed and working before the 22.04 upgrade. It also seems that some
additional steps would
It works now,
The soundcard *must* be the first thing to setup,
otherwise it won't work.
I put in a new SD card, set up the soundcard first and then
LMS IP : 192.168.2.60
This warning :
DO THIS FIRST: SELECT AUDIO OUTPUT, THEN PRESS [ SAVE ]
was the problem,
thanks to all.;)
My comment here could be construed as naive, but assuming the question
is bit-perfect output from a Squeezelite instance running on RPi-OS,
(output samples to stdout using -o -) then what happens if in LMS, the
player's audio volume control setting option is fixed to 100% ??? I
imagine the OP is
zzzap wrote:
> What OS are your Squeezelite running on?
>
A pretty basic RPi setup: Pi Zero W, PiOS, JustBoom Digi Zero hat, coax
out to RME DAC -> RME USB -> Linux box -> Sox capture.
Here's a capture of a 1kHz 24-bit signal through the above, from my
piCorePlayer Pi-4 LMS server. A couple
zzzap wrote:
>
> Anyone familiar with the LMS code stack that can point me to the files
> where 'stdout' are picket up and sendt to the output?
Code:
→ Slim/Player/Song.pm (open) -→
Slim/Player/SongStreamController.pm →
↓
The top waveform is the output of Squeezeplay on Windows 10 recorded
using WASAPI loopback in Audacity
The bottom waveform is the original FLAC
They look noticeably different. Why would there be such a difference?
+---+
|Filename:
chicks wrote:
> I converted a couple of RME's bit-perfect test files from WAV to FLAC
> using Sox. They still show bit-perfect on the RME ADI-2 DAC FS screen
> when played through Squeezelite from my LMS server.
>
> https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1374592/Rme-Audio-Adi-2-Dac.html?page=63
Wha
paul- wrote:
> Here is the request to get a list of favorites
>
> >
Code:
> > {"id":1,"method":"slim.request","params":[ "-",
["favorites","items","0","100"]]}
> >
>
> That will return JSON output of your favorites. You only need to do
> this w
The fact that I can send MQA files to my DAC through squeezelite and the
DAC says they are bitperfect strongly casts doubt on this assertion.
pjc8151's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=69245
View th
I converted a couple of RME's bit-perfect test files from WAV to FLAC
using Sox. They still show bit-perfect on the RME ADI-2 DAC FS screen
when played through Squeezelite from my LMS server.
https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1374592/Rme-Audio-Adi-2-Dac.html?page=63
piTouch w/JustBoom DigiHa
Final test to exclude the flac application from the equation.
Code:
flac -dcs --force-raw-format --endian=little --sign=signed srv.flac >
srvPIPE.pcm
ffmpeg -f s16le -ar 44.1k -ac 2 -i srvPIPE.pcm srvPIPE.wav
Here we use the same command string
slartibartfast wrote:
> I tried recording a track from Squeezelite-X using WASAPI loopback in
> Audacity. The recorded track is around 2dB higher peak amplitude than
> the original FLAC file but I have no idea why.
I've seen similar from HiFi Berry S/PDIF where there are some -3 dB.
That could
zzzap wrote:
> Thats what DeltaWave are for I think ;)
>
> Fact is I can repeatedly capture a bit perfect stream from WAV files.
> LMS use 'flac -d' output to stdout. This in theory should give us
> exactly the same result as if I use 'flac -d' manually on the FLAC file
> and then stream the W
@ Man in a van,
Mint is excellent, comes in 32bit and the distribution is still being
upgraded. I tried it many years ago instead of Kubuntu, but it was not
very good. Now it is a worthy competitor. The File Manager (nemo) can do
split panes like Dolphin, can run as root, unlike Dolphin which has
Hello
I've testet on different Boxes: SB3, Touch and Radio.
I din't can reproduce the Skip on the same Track.
But if i play an Playlist, it skips to the next Track.
All the my mp3 Files are ok.
What can i do?
Thanks for Help.
Kind Regards
Philipp
slartibartfast wrote:
> Have you examined the waveforms in Audacity to see if you can see any
> difference when zoomed in to individual samples?
Thats what DeltaWave are for I think ;)
Fact is I can repeatedly capture a bit perfect stream from WAV files.
LMS use 'flac -d' output to stdout. Thi
zzzap wrote:
> When capturing S/PDIF or analog out whatever medium used will be hard to
> compare. I've tried. Only usefull data I found is the clock and jitter
> difference. And even that might not be of interest using a modern DAC.
>
> I duplicate the Alsa stream comming from Squeezelite. And
slartibartfast wrote:
> How are you capturing the output files?
When capturing S/PDIF or analog out whatever medium used will be hard to
compare. I've tried. Only usefull data I found is the clock and jitter
difference. And even that might not be of interest using a modern DAC.
I duplicate the
I think you should ask in a Material thread about this. LMS is doing its
thing. But I don't know what the Material skin is displaying. Whether
it's the file's format, or the stream's.
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slimdevices.com
h
-But that means that LMS is not running on the pCP itself, doesn't it?
As
it's running in Docker, that's ok.-
I'm happy to know that, I was focused on that message.
Yes the port are forwarded one-on-one, and set in the Synology firewall.
---
But in PiCorecore player there's still this message:
LMS is not running (red cross)
But that means that LMS is not running on the pCP itself, doesn't it? As
it's running in Docker, that's ok.
I access both websites on my computer, no problems, except Picoreplayer
can't see LMS on my Synology
How are you capturing the output files? I have messed around with
Deltawave to compare pCP to mpd and results are influenced by the
position of samples on the waveform. The developer of the software has
said that comparing output waveforms to original files doesn't work too
well.
Sent from my Pi
Setting the container in "host mode" also didn't work. I've tried this
now...
I also used my container IP address: 172.17.0.1 No luck either
I to think it has something to do with the "broadcast"
maybe I'm missing a certain protocol...
There are 32 and 64 bit intel builds of squeezelite 1.8.4-R2 available
'here'
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmsclients/files/squeezelite/linux/r2/).
Note that R2 is based on a very old version of squeezelite and therefore
is missing many enhancements and bug fixes.
Ralphy
*1*-Touch, *5*-
If LMS is on that .60 IP address ... same as the NAS ... then I presume
Docker is already in host mode ... otherwise I think it would be at a
different IP address.
Paul Webster
author of \"now playing\" plugins covering radio france (fip etc),
planetradio (bauer - kiss, absolute, scala, jazzfm
Yes, I can access LMS web interface from a PC on my network via port
9000.
My whole network is only 192.168.2.X
I tell Squeezelite the explicit IP address to use to reach LMS by this
setting: LMS IP : 192.168.2.60 (my Synology)
I wil try to put it in "host mode"...
i come back...
---
Can you access LMS web interface from a PC on your network via port
9000?
Is all of your network on 192.168.2.xxx ?
My first suspicion would be Docker on the NAS not seeing the broadcast
from the player.
You could put it in host mode (if applicable on the NAS) or tell
Squeezelite the explicit I
Raspberry Pi 4
piCorePlayer v8.2.0 | www v00017 | linux 5.15.35-pcpCore-v8 (64) |
piCore v13.2 | Squeezelite v1.9.9-1414-pCP
Synology DS918+
Docker: Logitech Media Server Version: 8.2.0
Ports 9000 3483 UDP TCP
My piCorePlayer configuration:
LMS IP : 192.168.2.60
BothLMS en PiCoreplayer are ru
Messing around with Deltawave https://deltaw.org/ I found that capturing
Alsa output from Squeezelite on RPi-OS I have absolutely bit perfect
output from Squeezelite if streaming WAV files from local network.
Sadly results from streaming FLAC where not as joyful and comply with
listening observat
Thank you. If you are able to see my screen dump in my first post that
show my interpretation of that setting.
And I also conclude from the log that the stream is transcodet on the
server.
Reason for me to be absolutely sure are for troubleshooting another
problem.
doobre wrote:
> Well the ISP guy whom I have been speaking to during this issue didn't
> know of anything that was changed this end... So it's a mystery.
>
> I just hope it doesn't return, but I feel that it may, and I know that
> this isn't the first time, I had similar problems in 2017.. same
31 matches
Mail list logo
