>>> Baumgaertel Oliver wrote:
>>> I do understand that there were a couple of people in the past asking
>>> for exactly that and it was denied. I am currently in the position to
>>> have the freedom to start a new icap code project. But before I dive
>>> headfirst into it, I'd ask if it is at all p
Hi,
Ok the news for icap-patch for squid are not good.
I am putting some effort and I believe that day by day
will become more stable.
Baumgaertel Oliver wrote:
I've taken a look at 2.5.STABLE9 and managed
sofar to apply all the patches but the 2Gig one to this combination,
creating a thing that cr
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Joe Cooper wrote:
Though there have been occasions where a new branch was started just to "keep
up" with what a side project was doing. Sometimes those branches get merged
into the next development release, either by someone else, or the same person
that started the branch.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Baumgaertel Oliver wrote:
Well Henrik, that was my point exactly. The problem I have with that is
plain and simple. Squid 3 is in development since what, 3 years now?
It'll take at least another year to get it into a usable, complete release.
Yes. Not the proudest release cycle
Hi all!
I'm making a little program witch enumerates squid cache directory and
puts all urls (fetched from cache objects) into mysql database
I noticed that there is 0x3B bytes of data at the begin of every object
and it is exactly 0x3B bytes for all objects (I didn't look at the squid
source)
i
Baumgaertel Oliver wrote:
Same procedure as last time... It won't patch against the normal STABLE9
branch. What is exactly what I was talking about in the first place. It's no
use if we can't run the patch at least against ones that were already
introduced some time ago.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Nikcolay Pelov wrote:
I know that it's better to have a look of source code, but I need some hints.
The on-disk cache format is documented in the programmers guide.
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/Prog-Guide/prog-guide-28.html
Regards
Henrik
