I'm done now. Welcome to IPv6 everyone ;-)
NOTE for the OS maintainers;
from the 16 Dec daily snapshot --enable-ipv6 on OS which can take it
should not cause any problems running it without IPv6 access. Squid will
simply do a clean failover to IPv4 until IPv6 becomes available. etails
are a
On lör, 2007-12-15 at 14:54 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Yes I applied the code by 'patch -p1'.
Good. Then there is no risk of accidently backing out others edits.
> I will need some help about adding the website /Versions/v3/3.1/ pages
> and the release-3.1.sgml notes. What need to stay/go/ch
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On lör, 2007-12-15 at 12:00 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Can everyone please hold off commits to squid3-HEAD for 36-48 hours. I
don't want it to erase any work you have done. Thanks.
Aren't you applying the changes using patch?
Yes I applied the code by 'patch -p1'.
On lör, 2007-12-15 at 12:00 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Can everyone please hold off commits to squid3-HEAD for 36-48 hours. I
> don't want it to erase any work you have done. Thanks.
Aren't you applying the changes using patch?
Applying changes by copy is dangerous. There is up to a day dela
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Now that 3.0 is branched. (is it complete?)
I'll be starting to import the new files for 3.1 in about 7-8 hours.
Leaving the core code change until any post-release shakedown period has
finished.
Any objectsions to 3-5 days?
OK, with the voting 2-earlier, 1-later and 2+ a
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 21:35 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On fre, 2007-12-14 at 18:26 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
He suggested a big(ger) delay than a few days to wait for bugs to
prevent 'inventing two patches for two branches'.
My opinion:
With SQUID_3_0 branched ther
On fre, 2007-12-14 at 14:36 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> My only regret is that I did not do the astyle check yet. If you can
> check what the latest astyle does to Squid3, please do that. I think
> having common automated format before the big commits would minimize
> formatting conflicts.
Has
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 21:35 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On fre, 2007-12-14 at 18:26 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> > He suggested a big(ger) delay than a few days to wait for bugs to
> > prevent 'inventing two patches for two branches'.
>
> My opinion:
>
> With SQUID_3_0 branched there is
On fre, 2007-12-14 at 18:26 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> He suggested a big(ger) delay than a few days to wait for bugs to
> prevent 'inventing two patches for two branches'.
My opinion:
With SQUID_3_0 branched there is no reason to hold back stuff from
Squid-3 HEAD.
Usually bugfixes is quite
