Re: Joining squid-dev List

Mark Nottingham wrote: Has anything been applied to 3 yet? I'd like to apply this patch, but don't want conflicting / slightly different configuration or implementation. Cheers, Not that I'm aware of. +1 from me. That seems to make it 3 votes (you, me, Henrik) so go ahead. Amos -- Please

Re: Joining squid-dev List

Has anything been applied to 3 yet? I'd like to apply this patch, but don't want conflicting / slightly different configuration or implementation. Cheers, On 22/05/2010, at 1:53 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: Bug w/ patch for 2.HEAD at: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2931 On

Re: Joining squid-dev List

ons 2010-05-19 klockan 12:14 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: which to me says that it's simply an indication of whether it's in-cache or not, not whether it's stale. Since the response headers come back on the HTCP response, the querying peer can figure out whether or not it's fresh --

Re: Joining squid-dev List

Bug w/ patch for 2.HEAD at: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2931 On 18/05/2010, at 4:33 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: tis 2010-05-18 klockan 15:12 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: /* * The 'need_validation' flag is used to prevent forwarding * loops between

Re: Joining squid-dev List

tis 2010-05-18 klockan 15:12 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: /* * The 'need_validation' flag is used to prevent forwarding * loops between siblings. If our copy of the object is stale, * then we should probably only use parents for the validation * request.

Re: Joining squid-dev List

OK. Any thoughts about moving where refreshCheck is called for HTCP? Cheers, On 18/05/2010, at 4:33 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: tis 2010-05-18 klockan 15:12 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: /* * The 'need_validation' flag is used to prevent forwarding * loops between

RE: Joining squid-dev List

-Original Message- From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:m...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:12 AM To: Cimic, Senad (Legal) Cc: squ...@treenet.co.nz; squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: Joining squid-dev List Hi, I'm looking at the same issue in Squid 2.HEAD (fortuitously

Re: Joining squid-dev List

tis 2010-05-18 klockan 22:59 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: Any thoughts about moving where refreshCheck is called for HTCP? Haen't looked at it. What is the problem? Regards Henrik

Re: Joining squid-dev List

Well, refreshCheckHTCP() is called when a peer receives a HTCP request, rather than when the HTCP response is evaluated on the sending peer. RFC2756 defines the semantics as RESPONSE codes for TST are as follows: 0 entity is present in responder's cache 1 entity is not

RE: Joining squid-dev List

Message- From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz] Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:09 AM To: squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: Joining squid-dev List senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: Hi, I'm following directions at http://www.squid-cache.org/Support/mailing-lists.dyn

Re: Joining squid-dev List

for this patch? I can look into changing it, shouldn't take much more effort... Thanks again, -Senad -Original Message- From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz] Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:09 AM To: squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: Joining squid-dev List

Joining squid-dev List

Hi, I'm following directions at http://www.squid-cache.org/Support/mailing-lists.dyn in joining this list... My main motivation is to submit a patch for the minor changes I made to the squid source described below: We're in the process of implementing squid 3.1.1 version for reverse proxying.

Re: Joining squid-dev List

senad.ci...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: Hi, I'm following directions at http://www.squid-cache.org/Support/mailing-lists.dyn in joining this list... My main motivation is to submit a patch for the minor changes I made to the squid source described below: We're in the process of implementing