On lör, 2007-12-15 at 14:54 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Yes I applied the code by 'patch -p1'.
Good. Then there is no risk of accidently backing out others edits.
> I will need some help about adding the website /Versions/v3/3.1/ pages
> and the release-3.1.sgml notes. What need to stay/go/ch
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On lör, 2007-12-15 at 12:00 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Can everyone please hold off commits to squid3-HEAD for 36-48 hours. I
don't want it to erase any work you have done. Thanks.
Aren't you applying the changes using patch?
Yes I applied the code by 'patch -p1'.
On lör, 2007-12-15 at 12:00 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Can everyone please hold off commits to squid3-HEAD for 36-48 hours. I
> don't want it to erase any work you have done. Thanks.
Aren't you applying the changes using patch?
Applying changes by copy is dangerous. There is up to a day dela
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Now that 3.0 is branched. (is it complete?)
I'll be starting to import the new files for 3.1 in about 7-8 hours.
Leaving the core code change until any post-release shakedown period has
finished.
Any objectsions to 3-5 days?
OK, with the voting 2-earlier, 1-later and 2+ a
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 21:35 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On fre, 2007-12-14 at 18:26 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
He suggested a big(ger) delay than a few days to wait for bugs to
prevent 'inventing two patches for two branches'.
My opinion:
With SQUID_3_0 branched ther
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 21:35 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On fre, 2007-12-14 at 18:26 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> > He suggested a big(ger) delay than a few days to wait for bugs to
> > prevent 'inventing two patches for two branches'.
>
> My opinion:
>
> With SQUID_3_0 branched there is
On fre, 2007-12-14 at 18:26 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> He suggested a big(ger) delay than a few days to wait for bugs to
> prevent 'inventing two patches for two branches'.
My opinion:
With SQUID_3_0 branched there is no reason to hold back stuff from
Squid-3 HEAD.
Usually bugfixes is quite
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Now that 3.0 is branched. (is it complete?)
I'll be starting to import the new files for 3.1 in about 7-8 hours.
Leaving the core code change until any post-release shakedown period has
finished.
Any objectsions to 3-5 days?
Weirdness...Adrians email to me has disappeared
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> Now that 3.0 is branched. (is it complete?)
>
> I'll be starting to import the new files for 3.1 in about 7-8 hours.
> Leaving the core code change until any post-release shakedown period has
> finished.
> Any objectsions to 3-5 days?
You can if you
On fre, 2007-12-14 at 14:57 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Now that 3.0 is branched. (is it complete?)
Yes. 3.0.STABLE1 is even published.
> I'll be starting to import the new files for 3.1 in about 7-8 hours.
> Leaving the core code change until any post-release shakedown period has
> finished.
>
Now that 3.0 is branched. (is it complete?)
I'll be starting to import the new files for 3.1 in about 7-8 hours.
Leaving the core code change until any post-release shakedown period has
finished.
Any objectsions to 3-5 days?
Amos
11 matches
Mail list logo
