On 29.06.08 10:07, Michel wrote:
> in order not to bother with client configurations and browser problems a
> good solution (because support free) is a transparent proxy and then you
> configure your firewall to skip the fwd rules for the addresses of your
> choice
However since intercepting of co
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008, Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote:
I see that there is an option to specify the number of threads for aufs.
What is the optimum number of threads / what is the default number that
squid uses?? can it be altered to have effect on squid perfor
Hello,
The cache-control values like "no-cache" and "no-store", are used for
a cache/proxy server generally.
Do they have the same effect to useragent's local buffer (ig,
Firefox's disk buffer)? Thanks.
--
Regards,
Jeff. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Roy M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cache-Control=private, s-maxage=0, max-age=0, must-revalidate
Looks strange. AFAIK, for a header including "Cache-Control: private",
Squid shouldn't cache it. Is it?
And, "max-age=0", does this mean each request to Squid shoul
On 6/29/08, Jeff Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you cache the dynamic pages? ignore Cache-Control: private
> headers or something like that?
>
The method which is used by wikipedia is cache all dynamic pages as
long as possible, but when user update, purge from it.
Example HTTP respons
Ok... now I am confused. I haven't set it up in a test environment, but
apparently I will have to.
Henrik, is it because I am using DG? I just could swear I read somewhere that
NTLM using a transparent proxy doesn't work?
- Original Message
From: Nick Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: H
We do NTLM auth with squid setup transparently. We get all the names and IP's
in the logs and it works great, no issues (Stable) in a 400 person call center
that bangs away on an internal web application very heavily. We use SmartFilter
and Squid to achieve this.
- Nick
___
On sön, 2008-06-29 at 08:48 -0700, nairb rotsak wrote:
> I am used to running Squid/Dansguardian/Samba with ntlm auth. But I
> have always used it as a stand-alone proxy.. never at the gateway. I
> do it this way because I was always told that the usernames will not
> show up in logs (ntlm's fa
On sön, 2008-06-29 at 10:15 -0500, Nick Lehman wrote:
> I figured out what was happening. I ended up doing a chown to the
> squid user on those files. Now I'm having another issue. None of the
> sites that I have blacklists for under squidguard are being blocked.
> I see the 4 processes running
Hello all,
I am replacing a St. Bernard iPrism. I know it runs squid (the client got
tired of paying for it and once I told them it just runs squid anyway, they
jumped at the chance for a little more control).
I am used to running Squid/Dansguardian/Samba with ntlm auth. But I have
always us
I figured out what was happening. I ended up doing a chown to the
squid user on those files. Now I'm having another issue. None of the
sites that I have blacklists for under squidguard are being blocked.
I see the 4 processes running along side squid, but nothing is being
block. Even the expres
You might find this useful;
http://www.mnot.net/blog/2008/01/04/cache_channels
Tell me if you're interested; there are a couple of bugfixes that
haven't made it out yet.
Cheers,
On 29/06/2008, at 1:40 AM, Roy M. wrote:
Hello,
A past discussion in list back to the year of 2001 said not
Nick Lehman wrote:
Aaarrgh! I've been working on getting a squid box up and running
(2.6_STABLE19) and using squidguard as a redirect program. I haven't
even been able to t-shoot squidguard yet as I can't even get Squid to
start. It fails to start no matter what. My config is a pretty
simple o
Aaarrgh! I've been working on getting a squid box up and running
(2.6_STABLE19) and using squidguard as a redirect program. I haven't
even been able to t-shoot squidguard yet as I can't even get Squid to
start. It fails to start no matter what. My config is a pretty
simple one. Default ACLs and
> On 27.06.08 07:40, Shaine wrote:
>> For instance , if squid runs in port 8080 , when a specific url comes
>> into
>> the squid via port 8080 , before it receives to port 8080 cant we
>> redirect
>> to a web server , which that url searching?
>> From the squid itself cant we find a solutions to h
Jeff Peng wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Roy M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You have a blog application, and use Squid as reverse proxy to cache
the dynamic pages.
How do you cache the dynamic pages? ignore Cache-Control: private
headers or something like that?
No. Squid will cach
I will see what I can do, but I am not allowed to do changes in AD at
work, so I have to ask someone. But before that I want to upgrade to
squid 2.7, which I have to do carefully.
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:52:42 +0100
"Markus Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you mind testing with an incr
17 matches
Mail list logo
