Now I understood Squid is not 100% HTTP 1.1 complaints.
1. Why it that? Too hard to implement?
The small parts still missing are not seen very important by most, and
requires a quite big effort to get done.
2. Which parts in the HTTP 1.1 are supported by Squid?
Today almost all, except
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Henrik Nordstrom
hen...@henriknordstrom.net wrote:
Today almost all, except for forwarding of intermediate 1xx response
messages or forwarding of requests using chunked encoding.
Thanks.
It was clear now.
Btw, I have one question not related is:
Is
Navjeet wrote:
Well we have many servers in our development environment (windows
server 2003) that access web services on the internet. They have to
all go through our company's proxy server (which is NTLM based). Now
these servers have applications that are running all the time (as
windows
Jakob Curdes wrote:
Al - Image Hosting Services schrieb:
Hi,
I have routing set up to push everything from port 21 to the squid
proxy port. This doesn't seem to work even with IE using ftp on
Windows. However on linux FireFox works fine when I configure it to
use the proxy with ftp
Dear squid-users,
I have asked this question--twice!--before. I'm just repeating it in the
hope there's been some changes since back when I asked it.
Are there any tools out there for systematic querying and extraction of
objects (sans headers) from a squid cache directory? Let's say someone
Dear friends,
I have configured a squid cache box with one ethernet card that is work with
mikrotik. All traffic from mikrotik destinated to port 80 are routed to the
cache box. Everything works fine except for one major problem: squid is
consuming all the bandwidth because there is no
Henrik Nordstrom ha scritto:
lör 2009-09-12 klockan 10:28 +0200 skrev matteo cazzador:
Excuse me for my terrible english, i want 2 things
1. that if parent proxy (contenti filter dansguardian) go down , the
local proxy permit the navigation (http and https).
2. https passing through parent
sön 2009-09-13 klockan 15:11 +0800 skrev Wong:
Is this issue relate to Symantec Liveupdate problem if HTTP proxied by
Squid?
No idea. Don't know Symantec Liveupdate.
Regards
Henrik
sön 2009-09-13 klockan 15:24 +0800 skrev Ryan Chan:
Is that only if and only if a user press F5 in their browser, the IMS
will be sent?
No. IMS is a cache validation and is done by caches (including browser
caches) whenever there is access to a stale object.
Regards
Henrik
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Jakob Curdes wrote:
Al - Image Hosting Services schrieb:
Hi,
I have routing set up to push everything from port 21 to the squid proxy
port. This doesn't seem to work even with IE using ftp on Windows. However
on linux FireFox works fine when I
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:35:47 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom
hen...@henriknordstrom.net wrote:
sön 2009-09-13 klockan 15:11 +0800 skrev Wong:
Is this issue relate to Symantec Liveupdate problem if HTTP proxied by
Squid?
No idea. Don't know Symantec Liveupdate.
Symantec had some severe issues
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Jakob Curdes wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:06:04 +0200
From: Jakob Curdes j...@info-systems.de
To: Al - Image Hosting Services az...@zickswebventures.com
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] port 21 to squid
Al - Image Hosting Services
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:05:24 +0100, Genaro Flores genaro.flo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear squid-users,
I have asked this question--twice!--before. I'm just repeating it in the
hope there's been some changes since back when I asked it.
Are there any tools out there for systematic querying and
Hi, all
The default connect-fail-limit value on squid-3.1.0.7 was 10.
But, squid-3.1.0.13's one becomes just 1... Why ?
cache_cf.cc on squid-3.1.0.13
1891 if (p-connect_fail_limit 1)
1892 p-connect_fail_limit = 1;
Sincerely,
--
Mikio Kishi
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:09:39 +0900, Mikio Kishi mki...@104.net wrote:
Hi, all
The default connect-fail-limit value on squid-3.1.0.7 was 10.
But, squid-3.1.0.13's one becomes just 1... Why ?
cache_cf.cc on squid-3.1.0.13
1891 if (p-connect_fail_limit 1)
1892
Hi Amos,
The changes you suggested worked perfectly. Thankyou. What I'm not quite sure
of is why. I assume in this context, the all at the end of the line is not
acting as a user list, but a URL list or something else?
Regards,
Dion
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:27 +1000, Dion Beauglehall
beaugleha...@vermontsc.vic.edu.au wrote:
Hi Amos,
The changes you suggested worked perfectly. Thankyou. What I'm not
quite
sure of is why. I assume in this context, the all at the end of the
line
is not acting as a user list, but a URL
Dear All,
My setup is like this. I'm using dansguardian, squid, havp and I have
two ISP connections. In squid.conf I have given:
acl mac arp '/etc/squid/mac'
tcp_outgoing_address w.x.y.z mac
So, when I'm using only squid, the mac ID's present in '/etc/squid/mac'
are going through the IP
Santhosh Kumar Gulla wrote:
Dear All,
My setup is like this. I'm using dansguardian, squid, havp and I have
two ISP connections. In squid.conf I have given:
acl mac arp '/etc/squid/mac'
tcp_outgoing_address w.x.y.z mac
So, when I'm using only squid, the mac ID's present in '/etc/squid/mac'
19 matches
Mail list logo
