Hi there,
i have installed squid 2.5 stable 10 on fedora core 3 on pentium
4 processor 512 ram pc and scsi hard disk
my cache dir conf is:
cache_dir ufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache 3 14 256
cache dir now is getting 38% but its realy slow even no one working on it
now but me
a
Thanks all. My squid server is better good work.
This problem is to slow squid server.
I chekc FAQ 'http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.17'
My squid server show below
--
Number of HTTP requests received: 162076
Greetings List,
I am writing for ideas on how I can increase the performance of my squid
cache.
I am running:
RHEL ES 3.0
cache_dir aufs on ext2
squid-2.5.STABLE3-6.3E
adzapper version 3.3 with wrapzap
Two cache_dirs totalling 42.4 GB
The hardware is:
Dell PE 1650
2-Intel PIII 1133 MHz
4 GB R
On 11.07 17:41, Omnia Ibrahem wrote:
>i have installed squid 2.5 stable 10 on fedora core 3 on pentium
> 4 processor 512 ram pc and scsi hard disk
>
> my cache dir conf is:
> cache_dir ufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache 3 14 256
>
> cache dir now is getting 38% but its realy slow eve
that's a huge cache, seems that was your bottleneck
> On 11.07 17:41, Omnia Ibrahem wrote:
> >i have installed squid 2.5 stable 10 on
> fedora core 3 on pentium
> > 4 processor 512 ram pc and scsi hard disk
> >
> > my cache dir conf is:
> > cache_dir ufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache 3
Sturgis, Grant wrote:
RHEL ES 3.0
cache_dir aufs on ext2
squid-2.5.STABLE3-6.3E
adzapper version 3.3 with wrapzap
Two cache_dirs totalling 42.4 GB
42 GB cache is... a lot. Especially since every stored object consumes
memory. You should lower your cache size so that it holds about a week
of da
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Slow Squid
Greetings List,
I am writing for ideas on how I can increase the performance of my squid
cache.
I am running:
RHEL ES 3.0
cache_dir aufs on ext2
squid-2.5.STABLE3-6.3E
adzapper ve
On 15.11 12:23, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> I am writing for ideas on how I can increase the performance of my squid
> cache.
>
> I am running:
>
> cache_dir aufs on ext2
[...]
> The hardware is:
>
> Dell PE 1650
> 2-Intel PIII 1133 MHz
> 4 GB RAM
>
> The symptom is that during our peak utilizatio
Sturgis, Grant wrote:
The hardware is:
Dell PE 1650
Are you using PERC2/3 hardware RAID?
I found on the similar machines we run here that the hardware RAID
performance under Linux is outrageously poor. I converted all our
machines to software raid and the performance improved from about 15MB/s
w
CPU.
>
> Chris
Thanks for the reply, Chris.
Grant
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sturgis, Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [squid-users] Slow Squid
>
>
> Greetings List,
>
> On 15.11 12:23, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> > I am writing for ideas on how I can increase the performance of my
> > squid cache.
> >
> > I am running:
> >
> > cache_dir aufs on ext2
> [...]
>
> > The hardware is:
> >
> > Dell PE 1650
> > 2-Intel PIII 1133 MHz
> > 4 GB RAM
> >
> > The sympt
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow Squid
>
>
> Sturgis, Grant wrote:
>
> > The hardware is:
> >
> > Del
D]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Slow Squid
>
> You state that response time is slow, but not which. Is that
> average, misses, near misses or hits? What are each of the
> other rates?
I am referring to the median response time for all requests.
Hits range up to 800 - 900 ms durin
> > On 15.11 12:23, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> > > One thing that is concerning:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] squid]# free -m
> > > total used free sharedbuffers
> > > cached
> > > Mem: 3778 3756 22 0472
> > > 2154
> > > -/+ bu
7;m
reading. *shrug*
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow Squid
> > On 15.11 12:23, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> > > One thing that i
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:51:28 -0900, Chris Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From the "free" man page:
>
> free displays the total amount of free and used physical and swap memory in
> the system, as well as the shared memory and buffers used by the kernel.
>
> This leads me to believe that y
On 18.11 08:51, Chris Robertson wrote:
> >From the "free" man page:
>
> free displays the total amount of free and used physical and swap memory in
> the system, as well as the shared memory and buffers used by the kernel.
>
> This leads me to believe that your system is using 3,756 MB of RAM, an
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow Squid
On 18.11 08:51, Chris Robertson wrote:
> >From the "free" man page:
>
> free displays the total amount of free and used physical and swap memory
in
> the system, as well as the shared memory and buffers used by the
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 14:19, Venkatesh K wrote:
> This box serves 250 req/sec (peak) and 101 req/sec (day average).
> Cache size is 170GB and median service time is about 45ms.
170GB ? Over How many drives?
What's your Maximum_object_size?
Is there a way to benchmark squid?
--
Ow Mun Heng
Ge
idea of the average speed
with/without squid.
HTH
-Original Message-
From: Ow Mun Heng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 22, 2004 2:34 AM
To: Squid-List
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow Squid
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 14:19, Venkatesh K wrote:
> This box serves 250 req/sec (peak)
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:34:25 +0800, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 14:19, Venkatesh K wrote:
>
> > This box serves 250 req/sec (peak) and 101 req/sec (day average).
> > Cache size is 170GB and median service time is about 45ms.
>
> 170GB ? Over How many drives?
> W
Hello Everyone,
I've been experiencing a slow proxy on my second Squid box even though
its general configuration is the same as my first Squid box, except of
course for the IP. See below for details:
Squid Box 1 - Connected to a 3Mbps DSL. Used by majority of users for
internet browsing. Run
Hi all,
I think Im having problem with my squid proxy server. To start with my proxy
server is DELL 2850 dual XEON 3.0 Ghz processor 64 bit architecture with 6
GIG om RAM and 5 x 36 GIG of hard drive, the software running is Fedora Core
2 64 bit software and squid 2.5 stable 7. Now here is wh
Regarding this FAQ:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.17
My SQUID is running _extremely_ slowly. (About 7-10 seconds for each web
page
to load). Lately I've had to bypass it which I don't want to do, since I
have squidGuard running. I think that the above FAQ *might* answer my
On 25.09.2012 00:25, Art Bermas wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been experiencing a slow proxy on my second Squid box even
though its general configuration is the same as my first Squid box,
except of course for the IP. See below for details:
Squid Box 1 - Connected to a 3Mbps DSL. Used by majority
Thanks Amos for the the reply.
Will do the changes that you suggested and will try again.
Will probably replace the box it self with a newer one or upgrade its RAM.
Will keep you posted.
Regards,
Art
On 09/25/2012 08:50 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 25.09.2012 00:25, Art Bermas wrote:
Hello
On 05.12 12:36, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
> I think Im having problem with my squid proxy server. To start with my
> proxy server is DELL 2850 dual XEON 3.0 Ghz processor 64 bit architecture
> with 6 GIG om RAM and 5 x 36 GIG of hard drive, the software running is
> Fedora Core 2 64 bit software
Message -
From: "Angela Burrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: [squid-users] slow squid; FAQ question
>
> Regarding this FAQ:
>
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.17
>
> My
, April 20, 2004 3:13 PM
To: Andreas Pettersson
Subject: RE: [squid-users] slow squid; FAQ question
Andreas,
Thank you for your reply. I have two problems.
1. Yes I have Apache set up on my server. But I cannot find the cachemgr.cgi
file that the FAQ # 9 mentions. I used the Linux find command,
but the interesting bits:
# client -p 3328 cache_object://localhost/info | egrep 'HTTP req|physical'
/Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Angela Burrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andreas Pettersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April
Thank you Andreas, it worked. Now I just have to figure out what's making my
squid so slow ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pettersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] slow squid; FAQ que
Try
squidclient -p 3328 mgr:info
(or "client" if using Squid-2.4)
Regards
Henrik
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Angela Burrell wrote:
> My SQUID is running _extremely_ slowly. (About 7-10 seconds for each web
> page
>
> 1:11pm up 14 days, 20:09, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.01, 0.00
> 37 processes: 35 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states: 0.2% user, 1.0% system,
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Angela Burrell wrote:
> That's what I thought, it should be fast. And it IS fast when I bypass
> squid. The server in question is our only server, it acts as a firewall
> (iptables), proxy-squid, and content filter (squidGuard). For some
> reason, the Mandrake software has par
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Angela Burrell wrote:
> At the time this was taken, squid seems to be running fine. The Internet is
> fast. Can you tell me what to look for in case it slows down drastically,
> again? Thanks.
The response times section is quite useful.
Also save "vmstat 5" output.
Both in
Hi, all
I've been upgrade from 2.6S2 to 2.6S3. it seems stable3 noticable slower.
yesterday I was rolling-back again to stable2, and it is faster. Both
stable3 & stable2 utilize cpu,memory,fdescriptor almost the same.
I'm using the same box & cache disk, with the same squid.conf file & exact
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006, tino wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I've been upgrade from 2.6S2 to 2.6S3. it seems stable3 noticable slower.
> yesterday I was rolling-back again to stable2, and it is faster. Both
> stable3 & stable2 utilize cpu,memory,fdescriptor almost the same.
How's squid-2.6stable3 noticably s
t was longer
time to loading a page.
Tino
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Chadd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] slow squid 2.6.stable3 comparing stable2 ?
On Fri,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006, tino wrote:
> When run stable3, it was many logs like this :
>
> 2006/08/19 22:08:04| STALE: Entry's timestamp greater than check time. Clock
> going backwards?
> 2006/08/19 22:08:04|check_time: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:07:04 GMT
> 2006/08/19 22:08:04|entry->timestamp:
fre 2006-08-25 klockan 09:30 +0700 skrev tino:
> When run stable3, it was many logs like this :
>
> 2006/08/19 22:08:04| STALE: Entry's timestamp greater than check time. Clock
> going backwards?
> 2006/08/19 22:08:04|check_time: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:07:04 GMT
> 2006/08/19 22:08:04|en
40 matches
Mail list logo
