> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:53:57 +1200 (NZST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I have just added a FAQ page
>> (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate) with the content of
>> this thread.
>
> Can anyone please make a link to
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate
> in http://wi
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:53:57 +1200 (NZST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have just added a FAQ page
> (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate) with the content of
> this thread.
Can anyone please make a link to
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate
in http://wiki.squid-cac
fre 2007-06-22 klockan 10:39 +0100 skrev Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
> It's cured. You were right about allowing access to winupdate. The
> confusing aspect is that some time back, we had to wrestle for a day to
> get it working after Windows updated itself. It turned out that you had
> to use the
Hi Henrik,
It's cured. You were right about allowing access to winupdate. The
confusing aspect is that some time back, we had to wrestle for a day to
get it working after Windows updated itself. It turned out that you had
to use the always_direct directive to get it work as it would crash out
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
tor 2007-06-21 klockan 14:22 +0100 skrev Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
If I am to guess you might need to allow access to the windows
update
servers without using authentication.
Is it possible to do that while retaining authentication for users?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that Amos. Can anyone please point me in the right direction
to documentation about configuring such features? The WU issues probably
needs expanding upon in the FAQs I guess. :-)
Thanks in advance.
Dietrich
The relevant squid.conf settings I know of a
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> That's what we do and it works very well. We do the same for common
>>> antivirus update sites too. :-)
>>>
>>> Just a thought on WindowsUpdate via squid though, it's very very slow
>>> through squid. Seems to take
>>> many minutes to check for updates, but when byp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what we do and it works very well. We do the same for common
antivirus update sites too. :-)
Just a thought on WindowsUpdate via squid though, it's very very slow
through squid. Seems to take
many minutes to check for updates, but when bypassing the proxy this is
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> tor 2007-06-21 klockan 14:22 +0100 skrev Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
>>
If I am to guess you might need to allow access to the windows update
servers without using authentication.
>>
>>> Is it possible to do that while retaining authentication for users?
>>
>> Yes
We implement windows update through proxy without delay pool and
there's no problem at all.
acl fast dstdom_regex download.windowsupdate.com update.microsoft.com
acl fast dstdom_regex download.microsoft.com ds.microsoft.com
#direct bandwitdhfull access to websites
delay_class 1 2
delay_parameter
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
tor 2007-06-21 klockan 14:22 +0100 skrev Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
If I am to guess you might need to allow access to the windows update
servers without using authentication.
Is it possible to do that while retaining authentication for users?
Yes.
Just allow access t
tor 2007-06-21 klockan 14:22 +0100 skrev Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
> > If I am to guess you might need to allow access to the windows update
> > servers without using authentication.
> Is it possible to do that while retaining authentication for users?
Yes.
Just allow access to the windows update
tor 2007-06-21 klockan 13:26 +0100 skrev Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
> PS: Below is a snap from the proxy log showing what's happening when I
> try to connect. Thanks.
The interesting log is the access.log, not store.log..
If I am to guess you might need to allow access to the windows update
server
Hi All,
I have an NTLM authenticated squid proxy and an trying to get to Windows
Update. Up until about 3 weeks ago it worked OK but then stopped and I
haven't been able to get it going since. I have microsoft.com and
windowsupdate.com in an always_direct acl and have used proxycfg to set
th
> Any problems downloading windows update througth squid ?
> Thank you.
>
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.54
M.
For me, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I made sure that
.microsoft.com url is not cached or needing authentication.
- Original Message -
From: "Dominique Bagnato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 4:36 PM
Subject: [squid-users] squ
Any problems downloading windows update througth squid ?
Thank you.
--
Dominique Bagnato - Head of the Technology Department.
French International School - Bethesda, MD. USA
Tel:301 530 8260 Ext:279 - http://www.rochambeau.org
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> I am having the exact problem (see my post from yesterday). I have created a
> temporary work around by adding:
>
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain .windowsupdate.microsoft.com
> no_cache deny windowsupdate
>
> to squid.conf.
>
> Any other ideas?
Look
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Palmer J.D.F.'
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid and Windows Update.
I'm having the same issue here too, which I first noticed yesterday. It
looks like https://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/ w
round would be appreciated, though!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Palmer J.D.F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Squid and Windows Update.
Hello,
I'm having a bit of an issue with Squid and Windows
Hello,
I'm having a bit of an issue with Squid and Windows Update.
In the last day or so we have noticed machines on campus failing to get
their WUs.
All goes well until I click the "scan for updates" link and then I get an
error, the M$ error is the seemingly infamous '0x800a138F' error.
Many p
21 matches
Mail list logo
