Remove the body test flag from nat_uac_test (flag 8 - SDP is searched
for occurrence of RFC1918 addresses)
There's no body in the REGISTER.
-ovidiu
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> now i have got sip-router processes up and running without any serious
> warnings and listen
o use K's sl or ser's sl module.
ratelimit sends replies internally. It would make sense to have a
single sl module (just like tm).
There are many modules that requires sl and all of them would benefit
from having a single sl module.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
the hard coded number of queues
and pipes and the fact that dynamic changes to pipes and queues are
not saved on restart.
Loading the queues and pipes from a db will require a redesign of how
the pipes and queues are stored internally.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:52 AM, marius
n the future, the ratelimit module should become obsolete and only
pipelimit should be maintained.
Also, I'm in favor of keeping the new module as simple as possible and
perform any fancy operations in the config file (like regex to pv via
textops).
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010
modules and moving the common code into a
library:
- ratelimit with config init
- pipelimit with db init
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Monday 01 February 2010, Jan Janak wrote:
>> > > I'm in favor of keeping this module
will see
which one has more traction.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
wrote:
> On Feb 02, 2010 at 13:41, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> Hello Henning,
>>
>> Having both method of initialization will just complicate the code.
>> Whe
t one single dialog should be kept in the proxy server P1?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Timo Reimann wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm currently working on improving the dialog module. As some may know,
> the module isn't perfect with regards to how and and
ll be sent, as the single dialog will have four
endpoints:
- UA1 (the original caller)
- P2 (the routed destination for the initial request)
- P2 (the incoming destination for the forwarded request)
- UA2 (the routed destination for the forwarded request)
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Mar 12, 201
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
> Hey Ovidiu,
>
>
> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> You are right about the today's server behavior with respect to this
>> case, but on the other hand, I disagree with the one dialog approach.
>>
>> IMHO two dial
a
> new dialog (since there's none to continue anymore). I cannot see any
> dialog handling problems in this approach.
I don't think that you got the right scenario here: when the call is
rerouted, it is rerouted by P2 directly to IVR and P1 is no longer
involved.
If P1
eft over dialogs in case of spiral calls.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Timo Reimann wrote:
>>>> Let's assume the following scenario:
>>>> UA1 --> P1 --> P2 --> P1 --> UA2
>>>> Now, UA2 rejects the call, but P2 decides
th a single media connection.
Just assume that P2 is proxying media using the nathelper module. In
this case, the media endpoint are different for the first and the
second dialog on P1.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip
o, if you have a single dialog, when you need to send BYEs on
timeout, where will you send the BYEs? What about the existing
modules that are already working on top of the existing dialog design?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.
> P1 --> P2 --> P1 --> UA2
In any case, I would prefer to keep the existing dialog module as is
and any new work to be done in a new module.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/3/20 Ovidiu Sas :
>
>> For instance the qos module is keeping track of the media endpoints
>> for the dialog.
>> As I pointed out in a previous e-mail, in a spiral case when P2 is
>> proxying the media
narios.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/3/20 Ovidiu Sas :
>
>>> In your case, wouldn't be enought if the dialog is created after the
>>> spiral occurs?
>> How do you know that a spiral will occur?
>
&
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 7b8b6f647365655afa210f5e95baef06398ef612
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=7b8b6f647365655afa210f5e95baef06398ef612
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed Mar 31 10:31:05 2010 -0400
kamctl: fix
Module: sip-router
Branch: kamailio_3.0
Commit: 3c4db3e110aae42f36e03e0d10792f4676063fa0
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=3c4db3e110aae42f36e03e0d10792f4676063fa0
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed Mar 31 10:31:05 2010 -0400
kamctl
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 0acd8963f76a4854e101210db17854ca8062ff61
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=0acd8963f76a4854e101210db17854ca8062ff61
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed Mar 31 14:05:51 2010 -0400
pkg: updated
Module: sip-router
Branch: kamailio_3.0
Commit: 48015a8e471ecadfb571fa94daa7300992fe6674
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=48015a8e471ecadfb571fa94daa7300992fe6674
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed Mar 31 14:05:51 2010 -0400
pkg
If the goal is to merge both 'ser' and 'kamailio' under the
'sip-router' name, then perhaps the common control tool should be
'srctl'.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 March 2010, mariu
null' or a specific keyword?
Thanks,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
I think 1 == 1 will be evaluated on each loop.
I really liked the old way: while( true ) { ... }
It was nice and easy to read.
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 04/01/2010 10:23 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>
>> How can I define a simple infinite
27;$true' will make the config more easy to read as opposed to
defining a variable just for the purpose of creating an infinite loop.
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
wrote:
> On Apr 01, 2010 at 22:23, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> If I defin
Yes, it was in 1.5 and it was really handy.
The modparam("pv", "varset", "true=i:1") seems to do the trick. It is
an extra line in the config but seems to be fine.
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
>
> On 4/
-1) at
cfg:/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg:10
I haven't used the varset before, so maybe I'm doing something wrong here ...
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Yes, it was in 1.5 and it was really handy.
> The modparam("pv", "varset", "true=i:
Ohh ... it is $var(true) and not $true
I think having a $true pvar would be nice.
But I would like to have the $true pvar for all flavors, not only for
KAMAILIO flavor.
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Actually, the modparam doesn't work. And I g
speaking of flavors, we should have a page on the wiki describing
all the subtle differences between flavors (maybe there is one, but I
couldn't find it).
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas writes:
>
> > Ohh ... it is $var(true) and
If we will add the $true to the pv module, then we should leave the
warning as is.
We have a workaround for 3.0.x and we will have $true in >= 3.1.x.
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
>
> On 4/7/10 8:18 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>>
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> sip-router writes:
>
> > I remember some discussions about how to handle string versus integer
> > AVPs, but I don't remember all the details.
> > I prefer to use int AVPs (my understanding - in kamailio 1.5 - was
> > that int AVPs were f
seems like a typical copy/paste error ...
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
>
> > > i'll fix the incorrect error message.
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
>
> for curiosity, i checked how this error has got into address.c and found
> that it was by this co
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
> I second turning it off.
>
> Further, IMO the header should be renamend to something like
> X-Debuginfo: ...
>
> IIRC "Warning" has often confused beginners (me too).
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Am 14.04.2010 11:10, schrieb Daniel-Consta
It should be ok. Please update kamctl to use the new rpc functions
for gw dump and reload.
-- ovidiu
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> is it ok to drop mi functions from lcr module (master version), since it
> already has the corresponding rpc functions?
>
> -- juha
>
> _
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: bae720e04c38976543d4d51229555e5b7f62dcaf
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=bae720e04c38976543d4d51229555e5b7f62dcaf
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed Apr 28 11:28:29 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 1dec97e86e473574d0b767af21ad6757fa4d1342
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=1dec97e86e473574d0b767af21ad6757fa4d1342
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed May 12 20:06:12 2010 -0400
sdp parser
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: f1944ead66d854c349fca67da2b13d2be3c7fc33
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=f1944ead66d854c349fca67da2b13d2be3c7fc33
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri May 14 15:05:17 2010 -0400
sdp parser
Module: sip-router
Branch: kamailio_3.0
Commit: a65b81983cf8ab90a4c40c8698ad1033bcdf205e
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=a65b81983cf8ab90a4c40c8698ad1033bcdf205e
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri May 14 15:05:17 2010 -0400
sdp
pyo files for kamctl, but when
> I tried to generate rpms on centos 5.5, these files were not found. How they
> are generated (since source tree does not include them) or can they be
> ommitted?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 3/31/10 8:07 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>>
>&g
proxy.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Klaus Feichtinger
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> under special circumstances I have a problem with the DIALOG module of
> SIP-Router/Kamailio version 3.0.2. The dialog module is used in combination
> with presence, presence_xml,
state machine as soon as the 200ok was sent
out.
For now, the only way to avoid this issue is to run with one single
listener. This will keep the ACK into the received queue until the
listener finishes the processing of received 200ok.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Klaus
This is an old problem, since the creation of the dialog module.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Monday 14 June 2010, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> It is a race between the 200ok being sent out and the update of the
>> dialog state machi
This is exactly how it was fixed in opensips by introducing a new tm
callback: TMCB_RESPONSE_PRE_OUT.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.06.2010 15:01, schrieb Klaus Feichtinger:
>>
>> Hello Ovidiu,
>>
>> I&#x
since the creation of the dialog module".
In kamailio 3.0, this is a regression due to the new ser tm module.
The sip-router tm module must be updated in order to avoid this regression.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Timo Reimann wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> This i
There is a new TM callback, but it is an alias to the old TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT.
/* response ready - might need to be executed before sending reply out */
#define TMCB_RESPONSE_READY TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 9591ceb0e3e03f31e41f062a2fc97f06720ed8a8
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=9591ceb0e3e03f31e41f062a2fc97f06720ed8a8
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed Jun 23 18:26:09 2010 -0400
modules_k
expected string type but record
doesn't match type"
I would like to have the argument interpreted as a string no matter
what I pass as an argument via rpc:
sercmd> some_cmd abcd
the above will work ok
sercmd> some_cmd 1234
the above will
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 6e00d85416e3138d152a280358e79693d738e14a
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=6e00d85416e3138d152a280358e79693d738e14a
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Thu Jun 24 10:28:52 2010 -0400
modules_k
On Jun 23, 2010 at 18:32, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> > What is the proper way to scan a string via the rpc interface?
>> >
>> >
>> > str string = {NULL,0};
>> >
>> > if (rpc->scan(c, "S", &string) < 1) return;
>> >
>
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 92761dbd0a2be28577829b919c250ae9d2680352
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=92761dbd0a2be28577829b919c250ae9d2680352
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri Jun 25 12:14:14 2010 -0400
core: sdp
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 0e608506687a171529d2d60f22aade8a72a7f7c4
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=0e608506687a171529d2d60f22aade8a72a7f7c4
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri Jun 25 13:06:12 2010 -0400
core: sdp
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 88429acf0776bb76dae0448416f4f5ebe8295b0d
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=88429acf0776bb76dae0448416f4f5ebe8295b0d
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri Jun 25 13:59:15 2010 -0400
core: sdp
e rpc interface, please advice if this
is the right way of doing it or if there is another better
alternative.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: ea6356bcbd80470d2183c6626eedaf7535dc3a2c
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=ea6356bcbd80470d2183c6626eedaf7535dc3a2c
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Sun Jun 27 14:22:10 2010 -0400
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 5a1d36d4fc94df11c1ff148ccd873f2fb2e82859
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=5a1d36d4fc94df11c1ff148ccd873f2fb2e82859
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Sun Jun 27 17:00:28 2010 -0400
core: sdp
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: c90ff4d4861fcd33c376122a0b0daf1ce7ca7522
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=c90ff4d4861fcd33c376122a0b0daf1ce7ca7522
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Jun 28 09:54:01 2010 -0400
core: sdp
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: b123419e493dbe938cec57ffa8850dbab5255ad5
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=b123419e493dbe938cec57ffa8850dbab5255ad5
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Jun 28 09:57:42 2010 -0400
modules_k:qos
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: cc10916886a583136bb608f6048b4f1c4eca2564
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=cc10916886a583136bb608f6048b4f1c4eca2564
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Jun 28 09:59:47 2010 -0400
core: sdp
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 6face3f2b282333f241cb28782874cfa5dee495b
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=6face3f2b282333f241cb28782874cfa5dee495b
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Jun 28 12:04:26 2010 -0400
core: sdp
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 986e8c19b4a66280f7e856174c375b12b791d3f3
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=986e8c19b4a66280f7e856174c375b12b791d3f3
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Jun 28 12:17:07 2010 -0400
core: sdp
So ... are there any objections of defining the rpc_cb_ctx_t typedef
inside rpc.h?
Thanks,
Ovidiu Sas
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to pass the rpc printf params between two modules via a
> callback functions.
> The current implem
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 10ba00838420a78c2cd6c2e99d8c5217b713a918
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=10ba00838420a78c2cd6c2e99d8c5217b713a918
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Jun 28 19:05:31 2010 -0400
core: sdp
n the core, all I want is to declare the
rpc_cb_ctx_t structure into the rpc.h in order to make it available in
an atomic way to both module a and b.
The real modules are:
- module a: modules_k/dialog (dialog.c:internal_rpc_print_dlg)
- module b: modules_k/qos (qos_handlers.c:qos_dialog_rpc_con
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: e5e03e8589851f3b115f8aca7dea40a34c597416
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=e5e03e8589851f3b115f8aca7dea40a34c597416
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Jun 29 09:53:05 2010 -0400
core: rpc
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 3a648a8bb05e891e52ca759ffc78c5f1807f6d1e
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=3a648a8bb05e891e52ca759ffc78c5f1807f6d1e
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Jun 29 10:09:27 2010 -0400
Merge branch
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: a2f7b089506bbb32b76d81d787eab0d9d9c8168e
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=a2f7b089506bbb32b76d81d787eab0d9d9c8168e
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Jun 29 11:28:26 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: a52d454125eee97f2c2c76aeb2db0244ebffdf12
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=a52d454125eee97f2c2c76aeb2db0244ebffdf12
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Wed Jun 30 11:51:56 2010 -0400
modules_k
Hello Juha,
Now that s and k version of the auth_radius are more or less similar,
are there any particular reasons against having a single version of
auth_radius?
In the end, I would like to see a single version for all radius modules.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Juha
module
(by dropping the other one). This will require no merging.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas writes:
>
>> Now that s and k version of the auth_radius are more or less similar,
>> are there any particular reasons again
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas writes:
>
>> I see In this case, just go ahead and push your changes.
>> If and when you have time, it would be nice to see a wiki page with
>> differences between the two versions.
>
> i
If it's not a big hurdle, can you take care of it?
It would be nice to get rid of as many duplicates modules as we can.
--ovidiu
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas writes:
>
>> > also, it would make sense to have a common auth module that coul
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 60c69abf1faeede5ce224b861b8f0eca9a8a452a
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=60c69abf1faeede5ce224b861b8f0eca9a8a452a
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri Jul 2 17:41:05 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 9f652c9de2e95671aecae2cdce00fb6c15a265ea
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=9f652c9de2e95671aecae2cdce00fb6c15a265ea
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri Jul 2 18:45:22 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 721354929365b57a1e0337dccde9d58ce8d03945
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=721354929365b57a1e0337dccde9d58ce8d03945
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri Jul 2 19:11:40 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 9ef1e02ac525368577efeabfd650c8c102827e75
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=9ef1e02ac525368577efeabfd650c8c102827e75
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Fri Jul 2 22:38:55 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 4ed0fcaf92979f6b8f88e4da6ad89c352f0594e1
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=4ed0fcaf92979f6b8f88e4da6ad89c352f0594e1
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Sat Jul 3 00:38:22 2010 -0400
modules_k
Hello Henning,
I will add an example to the README file.
My goal was to remove the dependency on the sl module.
The ratelimit module is now ready to be migrated from modules_k to modules.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Saturday 03 July 2
Done.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> do not forget to add notes about these updates in the migration wiki page:
>
> http://sip-router.org/wiki/install/3.0.x-to-3.1.x
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev
I have a fix for nathelper module. The commit will come by the end of
the week due to traveling.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 July 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> as discussed during our devel meeting, n
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 377e5afba8907b0ea84147459c881f6e5af11b0c
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=377e5afba8907b0ea84147459c881f6e5af11b0c
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Thu Aug 5 18:40:53 2010 -0400
nathelper(k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 12a33bc8d08cabefb2a0205d4f3c1140b4355707
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=12a33bc8d08cabefb2a0205d4f3c1140b4355707
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 9 16:38:09 2010 -0400
core: sdp
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: cfedffe13336bfdaba6e1dca1fed718858cdaea5
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=cfedffe13336bfdaba6e1dca1fed718858cdaea5
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 9 17:58:22 2010 -0400
core: sdp
load of the new rtpproxy module and all
the rtpproxy config params will be moved from nathelper to rtpproxy.
All functions will remain the same inside the routing blocks.
Before proceeding with this task, I would like to know if there are
any objections to this split.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
f
the nathelper module (s and k).
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/8/11 Ovidiu Sas :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would like to propose a split of the k nathelper module in two:
>> - nathelper module - will keep functional
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 855549c58b3012a2344260e0d0094ffd30bb9651
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=855549c58b3012a2344260e0d0094ffd30bb9651
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 16 00:09:42 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: cef5d23c230d64bba2e0a6ea22897dd7bd0a42ca
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=cef5d23c230d64bba2e0a6ea22897dd7bd0a42ca
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 16 00:05:11 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 48e555e0a671833c0231db9abc0131def5132623
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=48e555e0a671833c0231db9abc0131def5132623
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 16 00:14:20 2010 -0400
modules_k
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 6e917dffacbd8002e69c53511cb55eda9ae7db8c
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=6e917dffacbd8002e69c53511cb55eda9ae7db8c
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 16 00:17:35 2010 -0400
Makefile
re if it's the same issue, but it's worth mentioning.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2010 at 13:17, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> i build sip proxy from latest master and got this kind of crash during
>> startup:
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 5fedfc5276b63ddb9adf31ef10a8357c4a0248c6
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=5fedfc5276b63ddb9adf31ef10a8357c4a0248c6
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 16 09:11:04 2010 -0400
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 85f4d191a10be49a2c70a8f7c69cd261f1aadf01
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=85f4d191a10be49a2c70a8f7c69cd261f1aadf01
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Mon Aug 16 09:15:50 2010 -0400
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: f8ae37321fde6cb18b334f0abfee830b52fae70c
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=f8ae37321fde6cb18b334f0abfee830b52fae70c
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Aug 17 10:16:03 2010 -0400
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: b8f11766d74605da3ebe689b6be21fc0d8a11ca2
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=b8f11766d74605da3ebe689b6be21fc0d8a11ca2
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Aug 17 10:22:58 2010 -0400
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 359aacd999b2c7444bbce762ce99df2ec0fdfd91
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=359aacd999b2c7444bbce762ce99df2ec0fdfd91
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Aug 17 11:18:30 2010 -0400
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 03d5fa3629f2dc566ea6376558061c419bccc6fa
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=03d5fa3629f2dc566ea6376558061c419bccc6fa
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Aug 17 13:06:25 2010 -0400
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 5004a60ad8a9cd47a2c6a7fc6eae82c1b371f92a
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=5004a60ad8a9cd47a2c6a7fc6eae82c1b371f92a
Author: Ovidiu Sas
Committer: Ovidiu Sas
Date: Tue Aug 17 13:10:33 2010 -0400
is not production ready. A patch to an official release would be more
appealing for testing, but as I previously said, the best option would
be to integrate this functionality into the main rtpproxy repo. Have
you contacted the rtpproxy team about this new functionality?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On
Hello all,
The (k) ratelimit module is an enhanced version of the original (s)
ratelimit module.
Are there any objections in moving the ratelimit module from (k) to
generic and purging the (s) version?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr
/ obsolete
git mv module_k/ratelimit modules
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 8/31/10 6:24 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> The (k) ratelimit module is an enhanced version of the origina
st should be updated.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
___
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
committed)
#
# modules/privacy/README
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2010, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> $ git status
>> # On branch maste
1 - 100 of 653 matches
Mail list logo
