Stephenson Valve Gear

2004-08-31 Thread Steve Shyvers
At the National Summer Steamup Jeff Williams was kind enough to let me inspect the valve gear on his C-16. I had a question about why prototype Stephenson valve gear had two eccentrics per cylinder that each drove one end of the expansion link. The C-16 has only one eccentric per cylinder.

Re: Stephenson Valve Gear

2004-08-31 Thread Mike Chaney
Steve asked:- At the National Summer Steamup Jeff Williams was kind enough to let me inspect the valve gear on his C-16. I had a question about why prototype Stephenson valve gear had two eccentrics per cylinder that each drove one end of the expansion link. The C-16 has only one eccentric

Re: Stephenson Valve Gear

2004-08-31 Thread Keith Taylor
Steve, I cannot say for sure about the C-16, but the reason that the Aster C7S Mogul has only one eccentric, is because it isn't Stephenson's Link motion! It is a modified form of Walchaerts gear, but without and anchor and union link to impart the lap and lead functions to the valve, sepeartely

Re: Stephenson Valve Gear

2004-08-31 Thread Harry Wade
At 11:57 AM 8/31/04 -0400, you wrote: [snip a true Stephenson's Link Motion ALWAYS has two eccentrics, So, to make it short, if there is only one eccentric, it isn't Stephenson's [snip] So unless you make an exhaustive study of valve gears, some can be a bit difficult to identify. Sincerely Keith

Re: Stephenson Valve Gear

2004-08-31 Thread Landon Solomon
From: Harry Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip Without laborious study of the ancient texts (which I ain't about to do anytime soon) I can't say whether you are close or correct but IMLHO a single eccentric does not a Stephenson's gear make. I'd say that permutes it into something else but what I

Re: Stephenson Valve Gear

2004-08-31 Thread Steve Shyvers
Mike, Keith, and Harry: Thank you for the quick response. I got curious after comparing the Stephenson valve gear on my Graham single vertical to the C-16's valve gear. I consulted a couple of ancient, dusty, and dog-earred tomes, Harry, both of them had good diagrams but lacked sufficient