Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-09 Thread Susan JL Parker
5 Jul 2001 19:28:54 -0500 From: Trent Dowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges Hello Everyone, Thanks for all the information. Those were just a few things that I had wondered about for some now and decided that if the people on

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-07 Thread Jesse Grimmer
Jim, that is the best answer of any question I have ever seen on this or any other list!! I love it. Jess

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-06 Thread Royce Woodbury
Harry Wade wrote: > A I wouldn't have wanted to be the "nozzle man" > though. > > Cheers, > Harry The image is hilarious, if not funny.

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-06 Thread Harry Wade
At 09:35 AM 7/6/01 -0700, you wrote: >Would there not have been the facility to "bleed" wet steam with a hose to put >out a fire? That would be called the "steam lance", principally used for cleaning down the locomotive after a run (or in the US, after 12 months or 50,000 miles, whichever occur

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-06 Thread Royce Woodbury
Would there not have been the facility to "bleed" wet steam with a hose to put out a fire? Or at least use tender water? Of course that assumes that the loco could be located close enough to the fire. You're kinda betting the farm that way. royce (w) Jim Curry wrote: > Well, perhaps when the

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-06 Thread Trent Dowler
I like that idea! Jim Curry wrote: > Well, perhaps when they reached the barrel and realized all was lost to the > fire they climbed in with a straw in the mouth

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-06 Thread Jim Curry
Well, perhaps when they reached the barrel and realized all was lost to the fire they climbed in with a straw in the mouth Jim

O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-06 Thread Gary Lane
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:53 PM Subject: Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges > Trent, > The barrels were for fire control. There was nothing worse than fire on a > trestle and they did happen fairly often. Otherwise the platf

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-05 Thread Trent Dowler
Hello Everyone, Thanks for all the information. Those were just a few things that I had wondered about for some now and decided that if the people on this list didn't know, nobody would. What a great source of information you guys and gals are! Later, Trent P.S. - Speaking of gals, has an

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-05 Thread Cgnr
Trent, The barrels were for fire control. There was nothing worse than fire on a trestle and they did happen fairly often. Otherwise the platforms were also an escape route for workers when a train went by. Covered bridges were just a way to protect the large investment in building a bridge

Re: O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-05 Thread Jim Curry
Trent: The covering of the bridges was for weather protection. They had a big investment in the bridge and a cover was cheap protection. Just like a building, keep the siding and roof maintained and the thing will last a long time. Barrels: I always assumed they were for water for putting out

O.T. - Barrels and platforms on trestles, and covered bridges

2001-07-05 Thread Trent Dowler
Hello Everyone, I have several questions concerning railroading, but they are not directly related to small scale steam. Could someone tell me what the barrels are used for that I often see modeled, setting on small flat platforms sticking off the side of high and long trestles? I've had the