Hello Harry,
The reason I mentioned CAD is because I use the ASCII character set for
note and label creation. Knowing the ASCII set, or at least the part that I
find to be the most useful, prevents me from creating geometry for the symbols
that would not be associated with the text. When the t
At 01:55 PM 10/29/01 -0600, you wrote:
>To prevent further confusion about the degree symbol ( ° ), it will only
>work on the keypad, not the numbers across the top of the keyboard
>Being a CAD guy myself, I understand how Harry knew the trick,
Trent,
I'm not a computer wonk so I'm just using
Harry, Royce, et al,
To prevent further confusion about the degree symbol ( ° ), it will only
work on the keypad, not the numbers across the top of the keyboard above the
letters.
Being a CAD guy myself, I understand how Harry knew the trick, but I had
never thought to try it in e-mail sinc
Royce,
Yep, perfect sense.
I had remembered that the ME threads were 55 degrees, but I didn't know that they
had radius' at the root and crest. Learn something new every day, huh?
Later,
Trent
---.
| : : : : : : : [_9_] |'='|.-Twin Lakes-.|
/|.|___|'-._.-.___.-._.'|
/ ||_.--._.--..--._ |---\'-\-/=\-.-/=\-/'/
/__;^=(==)=(==)(==)=^~^^^ ^^^(-)^(-)^(-)^^
~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~^^~~~^~~~
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Michael Martin
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 9:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of sslivesteam
Subject: Re: die usage
The 2 4 8 sequence must be on the numeric keypad to the
right of your alphabet keys (with the number lock "ON", of
course).
--
Michael Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:54 PM 10/28/01 -0500, you wrote:
>I cannot duplicate it using the keystroke sequence you reference. What
email client >are you doing this in (the alt+248). I am using MS Outlook.
>Chuck
Chuck,
I use Eudora LT ver.3.0.6See my recent post to Royce.
Cheers,
Harry
--.
| : : : : : : : [_9_] |'='|.-Twin Lakes-.|
/|.|___|'-._.-.___.-._.'|
/ ||_.--._.--..--._ |---\'-\-/=\-.-/=\-/'/
/__;^=(==)=(==)(==)=^~^^^ ^^^(-)^(-)^(-)^^
~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~^^~~~^~~~
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Harry Wade
Sent: Sunday, October
At 04:16 PM 10/28/01 -0800, you wrote:
>So I was OK to start 60° threads as long as I didn't go so deep as to get
>into the radiused root & crest issues?
Royce,
It depends upon which thread you're using where. When ME/BA is used for
the female (tapped) thread, and Unified 60° for the male, th
Harry-
Your (°) comes through to me without problem.of course, I will forget
this dodge by tomorrow..by the way, I would like to compliment your
wonderful article in the most recent Small Scale Live Steam concerning water
level sightglasses. The intro was scintillating, and the article its
As always Harry, you comments are clear and enlightening. So I was OK to start
60° threads as long as I didn't go so deep as to get into the radiused root,
crest issues ? And I have always wondered how some people got a degree (°) key
on their keyboard and I did not. Now if I could just find th
At 10:52 AM 10/28/01 -0800, you wrote:
>I knew I could count on your formidable experience.
>royce
Royce,
I do have some experience in a very narrow area but I don't know
everything by a long shot, and don't want to, but since I've struggled with
this very thing you describe I thought I'd ch
Harry Wade wrote:
> Royce,
> I can shed some light on this but I'm afraid it's not what you'd like
> to hear. This is a bothersome problem Cheers,
> Harry
Thanks Harry. While it may not be what I wanted to hear, it DOES sound
correct. Thanks for taking the time to articulate the answer.
Well, Trent, my thinking was that the desired thread was an ME thread, and my
single point tool was a 60 deg and I wasn't sure that ME uses a 60 deg thread
form. i just set the tpi equal and didn't go the full depth so that if the thread
form was not the same, it wouldn't matter. And I also wasn
Royce,
I'm curious why you didn't finish out the thread in the lathe if you already
had it set up and had roughed out the thread.
I'm NOT being a "smarty-pants". I know you had a reason and thought it was
worth hearing.
Later,
Trent
At 02:04 PM 10/27/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi listers.
>die had no "reducing" screw. Just a chamfer on the outer edge
>And two "divits" where the lathe dieholder locking set screws would catch
the die.
>The must be some technique to get the die set to cut the correct diameter
thread.
>Any help ?
>ro
Hi listers. I just turned an arbor to .1875, pre chased a 40 tpi thread to about
.009 deep (final is about .013), used a 3/16-40 ME die to "clean up" the threads
and the final diameter turned out to be about .175. The die is a split die but had
no "reducing" screw. Just a chamfer on the outer e
17 matches
Mail list logo
