Re: [SSSD] Documenting the SSSD local domain, management tools, etc

2010-05-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 05/19/2010 08:24 AM, David O'Brien wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On May 19, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote: Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL do

Re: [SSSD] Documenting the SSSD local domain, management tools, etc

2010-05-19 Thread David O'Brien
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On May 19, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote: >>> Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain, >>> nested >>> groups, and related functionalit

Re: [SSSD] Documenting the SSSD local domain, management tools, etc

2010-05-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On May 19, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote: >> Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain, >> nested >> groups, and related functionality in the end-user doc (limiting it t

Re: [SSSD] Documenting the SSSD local domain, management tools, etc

2010-05-19 Thread Jakub Hrozek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote: > Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain, nested > groups, and related functionality in the end-user doc (limiting it to > the man pages). This raises the following issue: > > The

[SSSD] Documenting the SSSD local domain, management tools, etc

2010-05-18 Thread David O'Brien
Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain, nested groups, and related functionality in the end-user doc (limiting it to the man pages). This raises the following issue: There is a section in the draft doc at present, "Using the SSSD Management Tools", which includes info o