Hello Peter,
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:24:33 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
wrote:
You are right -- the words participating full JID in the first
paragraph of Section 7.2 unnecessarily and incorrectly limit the
matching for collection retrieval. I've fixed that:
Am 05.04.2009 um 20:40 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
Clarified:
http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0107.xml?%40diffMode=u%40diffWrap=sr1=2467r2=2990u=3ignore=k=
Sounds good :).
--
Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
On Sun Apr 5 19:18:59 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I'm open to doing this if someone wants to help with the CSS/XSL.
Didn't I send you some already?
And this can be accomplished reasonably easily with a minor XSL
and CSS
tweak, which I've attached in patch form.
Dave.
--
Dave
On Thu Apr 2 01:54:35 2009, Robin Redeker wrote:
If the server does route the wrong information to the wrong people
it's buggy.
Well... Possibly. Or it might be lacking sufficient information to
route correctly - that part we simply don't see today.
With a reverse roster lookup on a
On Tue Mar 31 21:59:46 2009, Philipp Hancke wrote:
Dave Cridland wrote:
[snip]
But then there's responsibility - right now, it's inarguably your
local server which enforces who gets your presence,
From a different point of view:
It is your server which controls that I get presence from you.
On 4/6/09 4:49 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Sun Apr 5 19:18:59 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I'm open to doing this if someone wants to help with the CSS/XSL.
Didn't I send you some already?
Ah, well you sent some RGB codes. I need a way to place a vertical
stripe down the side of the page
2009/4/6 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
Ah, well you sent some RGB codes. I need a way to place a vertical
stripe down the side of the page (100% of the height), which seems to be
rather difficult in CSS (although possibly it will be part of CSS3).
Peter
This should be quite easy,
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 4/6/09 4:49 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Sun Apr 5 19:18:59 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I'm open to doing this if someone wants to help with the CSS/XSL.
Didn't I send you some already?
Ah, well you sent some RGB codes. I need a way to place a vertical
stripe
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.imwrote:
On 4/6/09 4:49 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Sun Apr 5 19:18:59 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I'm open to doing this if someone wants to help with the CSS/XSL.
Didn't I send you some already?
Ah, well you sent
On 4/6/09 8:17 AM, Tobias Markmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
On 4/6/09 4:49 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Sun Apr 5 19:18:59 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I'm open to doing this if someone wants
On 4/6/09 7:28 AM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote:
2009/4/6 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
Ah, well you sent some RGB codes. I need a way to place a vertical
stripe down the side of the page (100% of the height), which seems to be
rather difficult in CSS (although possibly it will be part of
2009/4/6 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
On 4/6/09 7:28 AM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote:
This should be quite easy, unless you want it to have a vertical text
included.
The simplest way I can think about is adding a background image. :)
I was hoping to avoid image loads for our spec files.
What follows might just be nonsense, but I'm still speaking out. For
the trees, you understand.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
[snip]
You want to replace 2-4 with:
2') Home server collates roster by remote domain and emits one presence
stanza per remote
Dave Cridland wrote:
[snip]
sender doesn't want you to, which is substantially worse, and without
any bad actor involved. (I could be wrong here, please check this.)
So we argue to optimize the protocol for this case? Hmm, the other
side might get information I didn't want to tell him, well,
Waqas Hussain wrote:
I suspect the CPU cost would be lower with this proposal. Saved
bandwidth was more appealing to me than saved CPU time, but the
missing unsubscribed issue makes this optimization invalid, so no
point in attempting tests.
hashes or counters make it possible to check for
On Mon Apr 6 17:54:16 2009, Philipp Hancke wrote:
Actually, the current model enables a single client to bring down
a server by making the server broadcast large presence stanzas at
a high rate. Simplistic bandwidth control mechanisms such as karma
account traffic per socket, and do not
The XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF) is currently holding its quarterly
membership application period:
http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applications_April_2009
Applications are encouraged from developers and others who are actively
involved in the Jabber/XMPP community. To apply, create a
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Mon Apr 6 17:54:16 2009, Philipp Hancke wrote:
Actually, the current model enables a single client to bring down
a server by making the server broadcast large presence stanzas at
a high rate. Simplistic bandwidth control mechanisms such as karma
account traffic per
Version 0.2 of XEP-0264 (File Transfer Thumbnails) has been released.
Abstract: This specification defines a way for a client supply a preview image
for a file transfer.
Changelog: Add paragraph in security section about protecting agains malicious
thumbnail dimensions in offer. Fixed a typo.
On 3/31/09 6:07 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:23 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org
wrote:
Version 0.7 of XEP-0198 (Stream Management) has been released.
Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension for active
management of an XML stream
The FORM_TYPEs for Data Forms registry has been updated.
Version: 0.9
Changelog: Added missing jabber:iq:register:cancel and
jabber:iq:register:changepassword FORM_TYPEs from XEP-0077. (psa)
URL: http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/formtypes.html
On 3/22/09 7:00 PM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Mar 21, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Helge Timenes wrote:
I agree that mac is more general-purpose.
Well mac is maybe also too general?
Agree. Either nic or ethernet are fine with me.
Would nic be appropriate? In any case a bit of prose would be needed
On 3/20/09 12:25 AM, Helge Timenes wrote:
Firstly, I appologise for sluggish response. I ran into another
space-time continuum singularity...
It happens. :)
Secondly, see inline.
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/14/09 4:28 AM, Helge Timenes wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On
On 3/18/09 8:30 AM, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
2009/3/18 Remko Tronçon re...@el-tramo.be:
I think a VCard is exactly what you mean, or what do you mean by User
Profile?
He means XEP-154, but that one is dying anyway.
[Yes, I meant that, answered offlist not to pollute]
OK, I learn that
On 4/6/09 12:28 AM, Alexander Tsvyashchenko wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:24:33 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
wrote:
You are right -- the words participating full JID in the first
paragraph of Section 7.2 unnecessarily and incorrectly limit the
matching for
On 3/1/09 5:31 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Sun Mar 1 09:45:12 2009, Dirk Meyer wrote:
I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local
devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the
server. In that case the proxy registers all
--- On Mon, 6/4/09, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
From: Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net
Subject: Re: [Standards] Presence distribution
To: XMPP Standards standards@xmpp.org
Date: Monday, 6 April, 2009, 11:10 PM
On Mon Apr 6 17:54:16 2009,
Philipp Hancke wrote:
Actually, the
27 matches
Mail list logo
