On 9/29/11 10:50 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 28.09.2011 19:25, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
On 9/28/11 2:04 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Tue Sep 27 22:28:49 2011, Alexander Holler wrote:
Hmm, doesn't forwarding IQs be a problem for semianonymous rooms?
Especially for things like vcard?
Indee
On 9/29/11 1:59 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
What I was implying was, most deployed software is not following the
'message-with-subject-but-no-body' rule, and is following the
'message-with-subject-is-a-subject' rule. Making the latter wrong a
Am 28.09.2011 19:25, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
On 9/28/11 2:04 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Tue Sep 27 22:28:49 2011, Alexander Holler wrote:
Hmm, doesn't forwarding IQs be a problem for semianonymous rooms?
Especially for things like vcard?
Indeed; M-Link actually turns these off by defaultf
Am 27.09.2011 23:40, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
On 9/27/11 3:28 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 27.09.2011 15:29, schrieb Waqas Hussain:
11. Full-to-bare JID rewriting to support vCards
All(?) implementations are doing it, but it's not specified anywhere.
Should it be?
Yes, it should. Propos
G'day everybody,
On the XEP-0096, several stream methods can be used, and it's said that
In-Band Bytestreams must be implemented and can be used as a fallback
method if everything else doens't work. But I don't see any explaination
on how to do the fallback, so how are we supposed to do ? The
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> What I was implying was, most deployed software is not following the
>> 'message-with-subject-but-no-body' rule, and is following the
>> 'message-with-subject-is-a-subject' rule. Making the latter wrong and
>> the former right is going t
