Peter,
> > Section 4.2.3
> >
> > XEP-0308 specifies use of "id" in and . Could we
> > not just use "" along with ""? It would require some
> > text in
> > XEP-0308 that says that if is received without , it
> > shall be ignored. In -0301, it would not be ignored. "id" works, but
> > I would
On 8/3/12 2:54 PM, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> Mark, et al,
>
> I re-read the draft and here are my comments.
Thanks for the review. Paul, I agree with your comments, and I have a
few further thoughts here and there...
> Section 4.2.1:
>
> Why is "seq" only 31 bits? Since the same memory is consu
Mark, et al,
I re-read the draft and here are my comments. After I wrote all of this, I
thought it sounds like I'm pounding on everything. Overall, the text was
great.. it has come a long way. That said, here are my comments and
questions:
Section 1:
"and is favored by deaf and hard of hearing
On Jul 31, 2012, at 1:52 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0308 (Last
> Message Correction).
>
> Abstract: This specification defines a method for marking a message as a
> correction of the last sent message.
Edit suggestio
On 8/3/12 9:47 AM, Todd Herman wrote:
> I apologize that I didn't realize there was a separate pubsub list. I will
> see if I can jump on to it.
No worries.
We have a big backlog of mostly small fixes to XEP-0060, and this bug is
one of them. I suggest that we spend some focused time on the
pu
On 8/3/12 9:44 AM, Tuomas Koski wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> On 3 August 2012 17:16, Todd Herman wrote:
>>> I have been reviewing XEP-0060 (pubsub) and have come across something that
>>> is bothering me.
>>
>>> Throughout the document, notification events are highlighted and discussed.
>>> The events c
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 11:36 AM
> To: XMPP Standards
> Cc: Todd Herman
> Subject: Re: [Standards] FW: pubsub question related to notification events
>
> On 8/3/12 9:16 AM, Todd Herman wrote:
> >>I have been
Hi Todd,
On 3 August 2012 17:16, Todd Herman wrote:
>>I have been reviewing XEP-0060 (pubsub) and have come across something that
>> is bothering me.
>
>>Throughout the document, notification events are highlighted and discussed.
>> The events come as a Message element with a child Event element
On 8/3/12 9:16 AM, Todd Herman wrote:
>>I have been reviewing XEP-0060 (pubsub) and have come across something
> that is bothering me.
>
>
>
>>Throughout the document, notification events are highlighted and
> discussed. The events come as a Message element with a child Event
> element that is
>I have been reviewing XEP-0060 (pubsub) and have come across something that is
>bothering me.
>Throughout the document, notification events are highlighted and discussed.
>The events come as a Message element with a child Event element that is in the
>jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event >namespa
10 matches
Mail list logo
