Hey Thiago, is this protocol still in use? I've always liked it. ;-)
On 9/15/17 11:39 AM, Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) wrote:
> Version 0.2 of XEP-0278 (Jingle Relay Nodes) has been released.
>
> Abstract:
> This documents specifies how Jingle Clients can interact with Jingle
> Relay Nodes Service
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Sam Whited wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 11:15, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>> * Do we need to interact with some registry to get xmpps-server and
>> xmpps-
>> client SRV record service names registered? From my understanding, SRV
>> records
>> can use the name
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 11:15, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> * Do we need to interact with some registry to get xmpps-server and
> xmpps-
> client SRV record service names registered? From my understanding, SRV
> records
> can use the names as assigned in [3] or "locally defined" (whatever that
> mean
Now with my client developer hat on.
> 1. What software has XEP-0368 implemented?
I implemented XEP-0368 support in aioxmpp [1] (which is under LGPLv3 license).
> 2. Have developers experienced any problems with the protocol as defined
> in XEP-0368?
I did not have outstanding issues (the ones
Dear list,
With my XEP Editor hat on, we’d like to issue a Call for Experience for
XEP-0368. This is the step taken before proposing advancement of a XEP to
Final status to Council.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0368 implemente
Hi all,
A quick update on T-DOSE 2017.
As the amount of responses to Tim's suggestion to have a meetup was very
low, we've opted to not follow-up on the offer of a dedicated room for
XSF/XMPP. We did, however, request a booth. If you're interested in joining
us there, please let us know (either h
On 19.09.2017 12:35, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>
> The original authors of the XEP worked on a follow up version [1] which
> put the wire format into the XEP
>
>
> This follow-up version is in its current state even more underspecified
> than the libsignal one (for example, it's impossible to
> The original authors of the XEP worked on a follow up version [1] which
> put the wire format into the XEP
This follow-up version is in its current state even more underspecified
than the libsignal one (for example, it's impossible to know how to
authenticate the sent payload IIRC).
> and was
On 19.09.2017 11:37, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 19 September 2017 at 09:21, Klaus Herberth wrote:
>>> Hi Klaus,
>> Hi Andrey,
>>
>>> What do you mean by "libsignal"? There are at least 4(+1) libraries:
>> With libsignal I referred to your linked implementations of WhisperSystems.
>>
>>> Note, javas
On 19 September 2017 at 09:21, Klaus Herberth wrote:
>> Hi Klaus,
> Hi Andrey,
>
>
>> What do you mean by "libsignal"? There are at least 4(+1) libraries:
> With libsignal I referred to your linked implementations of WhisperSystems.
>
>> Note, javascript favor is already available.
> I know, but i
> Hi Klaus,
Hi Andrey,
> What do you mean by "libsignal"? There are at least 4(+1) libraries:
With libsignal I referred to your linked implementations of WhisperSystems.
> Note, javascript favor is already available.
I know, but it is GPL and this doesn't work for everyone.
> BTW, why is it
11 matches
Mail list logo
