Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-02-04 Thread Jonas Schäfer
On Dienstag, 29. Januar 2019 17:33:56 CET Georg Lukas wrote: > Hi, > > two more XEP-0410 issues that were brought up in the MUCs: > > It might make sense to create a *new* additional error condition in the > not-in-MUC error response, so that a client not wanting to implement the > different

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-29 Thread Georg Lukas
Hi, two more XEP-0410 issues that were brought up in the MUCs: It might make sense to create a *new* additional error condition in the not-in-MUC error response, so that a client not wanting to implement the different "ping error that is not an error" matches, and that relies on the new

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-24 Thread Sam Whited
Please also change the name. In retrospect, I wish I had -1ed the previous steps until this weren't in the title. It's a funny joke, but entirely unnecessary. —Sam On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, at 09:39, Georg Lukas wrote: > Hi Daniel, folks, > > * Georg Lukas [2019-01-15 16:35]: > > thanks very much

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-24 Thread Georg Lukas
Hi Daniel, folks, * Georg Lukas [2019-01-15 16:35]: > thanks very much for your feedback. I'd like to improve the XEP text to > make the points clearer to understand. I've incorporated a number of smaller text changes in https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/739 and would like to know if that

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-15 Thread Georg Lukas
Hi Daniel, thanks very much for your feedback. I'd like to improve the XEP text to make the points clearer to understand. * Daniel Gultsch [2019-01-08 18:31]: > I’m not sure. Is the intent of the XEP to keep me reliably connected > to a MUC or is it intended to figure out if I’m connected to a

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-08 Thread Kim Alvefur
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:54:22PM -, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > XEP-0410. > > Title: MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat) > Abstract: > This protocol extension for XEP-0045 Multi User Chat allows clients to > check whether they are

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-08 Thread Daniel Gultsch
Am Di., 8. Jan. 2019 um 16:55 Uhr schrieb Jonas Schäfer : > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol > stack or to clarify an existing protocol? I’m not sure. Is the intent of the XEP to keep me reliably connected to a MUC or is it intended to figure out if I’m connected

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-08 Thread Dave Cridland
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 16:55, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > XEP-0410. > > Title: MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat) > Abstract: > This protocol extension for XEP-0045 Multi User Chat allows clients to > check whether they are still joined

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-08 Thread Jonas Schäfer
On Dienstag, 8. Januar 2019 17:54:22 CET Jonas Schäfer wrote: > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol > stack or to clarify an existing protocol? Yes, sadly. The introduction covers this quite nicely. > 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the

[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0410 (MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat))

2019-01-08 Thread XSF Editor
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0410. Title: MUC Self-Ping (Schrödinger's Chat) Abstract: This protocol extension for XEP-0045 Multi User Chat allows clients to check whether they are still joined to a chatroom. URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0410.html