Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-18 Thread Dave Cridland
On Tue Aug 16 16:12:34 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 8/16/11 3:35 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Mon Aug 15 22:57:59 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> > 2) We also need to consider that many clients only handle one status >> > code. >> >> Which one do they handle? >> >> > I mean they will o

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 8/16/11 3:35 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Mon Aug 15 22:57:59 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> > 1) I don't think the new elements need to have a 1:1 mapping with >> status >> > codes, and the way in which the registrar considerations is phrased >> > implies this to be the case. I think we wan

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-16 Thread Dave Cridland
On Mon Aug 15 22:57:59 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > 1) I don't think the new elements need to have a 1:1 mapping with status > codes, and the way in which the registrar considerations is phrased > implies this to be the case. I think we want a new registry, which > includes "related statu

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-16 Thread Kevin Smith
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> 2) We also need to consider that many clients only handle one status >> code. > > Which one do they handle? It varies, some the first they receive, some the last they receive, I think. /K

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 8/12/11 4:49 PM, Waqas Hussain wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor > wrote: >> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. >> >> Title: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat >> >> Abstract: This document defines an extensible forma

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 8/15/11 2:25 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Fri Aug 12 21:37:18 2011, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: >> Title: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat >> >> Abstract: This document defines an extensible format for status >> conditions in Multi-User Chat, similar to the error format used i

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-15 Thread Dave Cridland
On Fri Aug 12 21:37:18 2011, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: Title: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat Abstract: This document defines an extensible format for status conditions in Multi-User Chat, similar to the error format used in the core of XMPP. I am in favour of the adop

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-12 Thread Waqas Hussain
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. > > Title: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat > > Abstract: This document defines an extensible format for status conditions in > Multi-User Chat, simil

[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat

2011-08-12 Thread XMPP Extensions Editor
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. Title: Extensible Status Conditions for Multi-User Chat Abstract: This document defines an extensible format for status conditions in Multi-User Chat, similar to the error format used in the core of XMPP. URL: http://www.xmpp.org