Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-26 Thread Dave Cridland
On Tue Jul 26 16:54:40 2011, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: Alright, now that we had some off-topic chatter on technical point of views, let's get back on topic. I think you may find that the topic of this list *is* actually technical points of view. I'd personally argue that the majority of poin

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-26 Thread Carlo v. Loesch
Alright, now that we had some off-topic chatter on technical point of views, let's get back on topic. I have not received any answer on the questions raised in http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2011-July/024756.html nor has there been a statement on the normality of these points:

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-22 Thread Dave Cridland
On Fri Jul 22 20:41:23 2011, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: It wasn't my plan to wash dirty laundry five years later, but here you go.. Yes, it was your plan, that's why you raised it in such hazy terms. I shouldn't have fed the troll, apparently. The problem wasn't very theoretical. Matthias Wimm

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-22 Thread Carlo v. Loesch
It wasn't my plan to wash dirty laundry five years later, but here you go.. > On Fri Jul 22 07:59:44 2011, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: >> I've seen the council decide upon proposed XEPs without even reading/ >> understanding them, so I wouldn't be surprised about other atypical >> habits. On Fri, Ju

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-22 Thread Dave Cridland
On Fri Jul 22 07:59:44 2011, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: I've seen the council decide upon proposed XEPs without even reading/ understanding them, so I wouldn't be surprised about other atypical habits. No, you've seen Council decide on proposed XEPs in a way that you didn't like, and you assum

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-22 Thread Matthew A. Miller
On Jul 22, 2011, at 08:32, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:11:07AM -0600, Matthew A. Miller wrote: >> > > I take that as a request not to be taken seriously. > Frankly, I cannot take you seriously. Yet, I am still waiting for your evidence regarding th

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-22 Thread Carlo v. Loesch
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:11:07AM -0600, Matthew A. Miller wrote: > I take that as a request not to be taken seriously.

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-22 Thread Matthew A. Miller
On Jul 22, 2011, at 00:59, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:43:03PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Your complaint is not about the role of the XMPP Extensions Editor, but >> with me personally. > > No. Why are you trying to take it personally? > I didn't even say I'm comp

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-22 Thread Carlo v. Loesch
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:43:03PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Your complaint is not about the role of the XMPP Extensions Editor, but > with me personally. No. Why are you trying to take it personally? I didn't even say I'm complaining. I am always willing to accept that this is the way w

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-20 Thread Philipp Hancke
Pulling this to the front... > This is not a matter of the role of the XMPP Extensions Editor, but a > matter of me personally. Well, this is partially a procedural problem. Feel free to follow-up on the technical side of things at http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2011-May/024559.html

Re: [Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-19 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 7/9/11 5:18 AM, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:21:22AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: It was published without Jeremie's approval as a co-author, too. :P As far as I could tell, the Extensions Editor has been Your complaint is not about the role of the XMPP Extensions

[Standards] Request for Clarification on the Editor's Job Description

2011-07-09 Thread Carlo v. Loesch
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:21:22AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > It was published without Jeremie's approval as a co-author, too. :P As far as I could tell, the Extensions Editor has been 1. editing XEPs and adding himself to the list of authors accordingly, at times without asking permiss