Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-26 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 9/24/11 12:14 PM, Kim Alvefur wrote: > I think it would be better to say "this room has moved". There is > mention of something like this in the section on destroying rooms[1], > but it's not mentioned how you should inform someone joining after the > room has been destroyed about the new locati

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-25 Thread Ludovic BOCQUET
Le 25/09/2011 11:54, Alexander Holler a écrit : > Am 25.09.2011 11:39, schrieb Kevin Smith: >> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Alexander >> Holler wrote: >>> Am 24.09.2011 23:51, schrieb Waqas Hussain: > > And handling room-aliases on the server side would have many pitfalls > (e.g.t

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-25 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 25.09.2011 11:39, schrieb Kevin Smith: On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 24.09.2011 23:51, schrieb Waqas Hussain: And handling room-aliases on the server side would have many pitfalls (e.g.the delay elements in the history). I'm not sure where else room-JIDs are

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-25 Thread Kevin Smith
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 24.09.2011 23:51, schrieb Waqas Hussain: >>> >>> And handling room-aliases on the server side would have many pitfalls >>> (e.g.the delay elements in the history). I'm not sure where else >>> room-JIDs >>> are used (besides in 'from'),

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-25 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 24.09.2011 23:51, schrieb Waqas Hussain: And handling room-aliases on the server side would have many pitfalls (e.g.the delay elements in the history). I'm not sure where else room-JIDs are used (besides in 'from'), that would require checking the whole XEP for appearances of room-JIDs (which

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-24 Thread Waqas Hussain
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 24.09.2011 11:57, schrieb Kevin Smith: >> >> MUC aliasing is actually one of the very few cases in XMPP where >> aliasing could work without protocol extensions. The server would know >> which alias each client has joined and can route

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-24 Thread Kim Alvefur
I think it would be better to say "this room has moved". There is mention of something like this in the section on destroying rooms[1], but it's not mentioned how you should inform someone joining after the room has been destroyed about the new location. Current implementations (AFAIK) forget abou

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-24 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 24.09.2011 11:57, schrieb Kevin Smith: On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: Hello, Am 23.09.2011 23:19, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: On 9/23/11 3:17 PM, EcliptuX wrote: Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote: Hi, On my

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-24 Thread Kevin Smith
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Hello, > > Am 23.09.2011 23:19, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: >> >> On 9/23/11 3:17 PM, EcliptuX wrote: >>> >>> Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote: > > Hi, > > On my

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-24 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 23.09.2011 23:17, schrieb EcliptuX: Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote: Hi, On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address conference.domain.tld I want to be able to create an alias like muc.domain.tld, but the XEP-0045 don't permit i

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-24 Thread Alexander Holler
Hello, Am 23.09.2011 23:19, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: On 9/23/11 3:17 PM, EcliptuX wrote: Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote: Hi, On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address conference.domain.tld I want to be able to create an alia

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-23 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 9/23/11 3:17 PM, EcliptuX wrote: > Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : >> On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address >>> conference.domain.tld >>> I want to be able to create an alias like muc.domain.tld, but the >>> XE

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-23 Thread EcliptuX
Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote: Hi, On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address conference.domain.tld I want to be able to create an alias like muc.domain.tld, but the XEP-0045 don't permit it. Is possible to add this specificatio

Re: [Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-23 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote: > Hi, > > On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address conference.domain.tld > I want to be able to create an alias like muc.domain.tld, but the > XEP-0045 don't permit it. > > Is possible to add this specification in the next release ? The specifica

[Standards] Suggestion for XEP-0045 : permit alias for the MUC address

2011-09-21 Thread EcliptuX
Hi, On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address conference.domain.tld I want to be able to create an alias like muc.domain.tld, but the XEP-0045 don't permit it. Is possible to add this specification in the next release