, Johannes
Betreff: RE: [Standards] Using .well-known/ to supplement XEP-0156
Hello Johannes
Well, you could start by creating one interface for an XMPP Server and one
interface for an XMPP client. That interface could have methods returning basic
information, perhaps something similar to what
-Original Message-
From: Hund, Johannes [mailto:johannes.h...@siemens.com]
Sent: den 28 juni 2013 10:35
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] Using .well-known/ to supplement XEP-0156
Hello Peter,
after a brief research, I agree that UPNP might be an interesting option for
XEP-0174
[mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] Im Auftrag
von Peter Waher
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 05:45
An: XMPP Standards
Betreff: Re: [Standards] Using .well-known/ to supplement XEP-0156
Hello Johannes.
The thought has crossed my mind. It has been nagging me as a good thing to do,
but I
to join an effort to create such interfaces and
related XEP(s).
Sincerely,
Peter Waher
-Original Message-
From: Hund, Johannes [mailto:johannes.h...@siemens.com]
Sent: den 21 maj 2013 07:30
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] Using .well-known/ to supplement XEP-0156
Hello Peter
://leaksource.wordpress.com/2013/02/01/upnp-vulnerability-exposes-50-million-network-enabled-devices-to-be-hacked-controlled-remotely/
-Original Message-
From: Lance Stout [mailto:lancest...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 20 maj 2013 13:51
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] Using .well-known/ to supplement XEP
be solved by UPNP?
Best regards,
Johannes
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] Im Auftrag
von Peter Waher
Gesendet: Montag, 20. Mai 2013 19:16
An: XMPP Standards
Betreff: Re: [Standards] Using .well-known/ to supplement XEP-0156
22:09
To: XMPP Standards
Cc: Peter Waher
Subject: Re: [Standards] Using .well-known/ to supplement XEP-0156
Peter,
(2013-05-19 03:13), Peter Waher wrote:
What about the UPnP method? Using SSDP? Creating some well defined
UPnP Device interface for XMPP Servers XMPP Clients, perhaps
exposing
On May 19, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Yusuke DOI yusuke@toshiba.co.jp wrote:
(2013-05-19 03:13), Peter Waher wrote:
What about the UPnP method? Using SSDP? Creating some well defined
UPnP Device interface for XMPP Servers XMPP Clients, perhaps
exposing the features of each device at the same
Dear Lance,
I don't think ordinary browsers will use binary XML (EXI) very soon (even DNS
may be omitted on IoT devices), but if you're going to make entries of
alternate transport, please make room for XMPP over EXI as alternate transport
binding. Next version of XEP-0322 will include the
Peter,
(2013-05-19 03:13), Peter Waher wrote:
What about the UPnP method? Using SSDP? Creating some well defined
UPnP Device interface for XMPP Servers XMPP Clients, perhaps
exposing the features of each device at the same time? Saves time as
you don't have to do service discovery on each
+1. Yes there is a registry at IANA, I can provide pointers a bit later.
Sent from mobile, might be terse
On May 17, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Lance Stout lancest...@gmail.com wrote:
So XEP-0156 details how to use DNS records to advertise alternative ways to
connect to an XMPP server, namely BOSH
As a self-proclaimed member of the DNS anti-proliferation league, I fully
support this. (-:
I'd be happy to help out this together. It would help solve some problems
we are facing.
- mm
{mobile}
On May 18, 2013 7:38 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
+1. Yes there is a registry
On 18 May 2013 14:44, Matthew Miller linuxw...@outer-planes.net wrote:
As a self-proclaimed member of the DNS anti-proliferation league, I fully
support this. (-:
Let's just define a way to put arbitrary TXT records in .well-known,
and make way for the inevitable DNS over HTTP. As they say, if
On 2013-05-18 15:44, Matthew Miller wrote:
As a self-proclaimed member of the DNS anti-proliferation league, I fully
support this. (-:
As a self-proclaimed member of the anti-HTTP resistance, I wish to
express my great annoyance. :P
--
Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/18/13 8:50 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 18 May 2013 14:44, Matthew Miller linuxw...@outer-planes.net
wrote:
As a self-proclaimed member of the DNS anti-proliferation league,
I fully support this. (-:
Let's just define a way to put arbitrary
Hello
So XEP-0156 details how to use DNS records to advertise alternative ways to
connect to an XMPP server, namely BOSH and soon WebSocket. That's great,
except that in the browser you can't make arbitrary DNS requests, which
severely limits the usefulness of this method.
Any interest in
So XEP-0156 details how to use DNS records to advertise alternative ways to
connect to an XMPP server, namely BOSH and soon WebSocket. That's great, except
that in the browser you can't make arbitrary DNS requests, which severely
limits the usefulness of this method.
Any interest in
17 matches
Mail list logo
