Am 22.09.2011 01:23, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 03:03, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga:
While XEP 45, Section 9.4 is reasonable clear that loss of membership causes a
kick from the room, Section 10.7 is less clear of what happens on loss
Am 21.09.2011 03:03, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga:
While XEP 45, Section 9.4 is reasonable clear that loss of membership causes a
kick from the room, Section 10.7 is less clear of what happens on loss of admin
privs.
10.7 says:
If the user is in the room, the service MUST then send updated
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 03:03, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga:
While XEP 45, Section 9.4 is reasonable clear that loss of membership causes
a kick from the room, Section 10.7 is less clear of what happens on loss of
admin privs.
10.7 says:
If the
On 9/21/11 5:23 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 03:03, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga:
While XEP 45, Section 9.4 is reasonable clear that loss of
membership causes a kick from the room, Section 10.7 is less
clear of what happens on loss
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
Personally, I think the occupant which loss admin privs to a
member-only room ought to be kicked. Others might think otherwise.
Why not transition from admin to mere member? I don't see a reason to
kick or ban
On 9/21/11 5:37 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
wrote:
Personally, I think the occupant which loss admin privs to a
member-only room ought to be kicked. Others might think otherwise.
Why not transition from admin to mere member?
On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 9/21/11 5:23 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 03:03, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga:
While XEP 45, Section 9.4 is reasonable clear that loss of
membership causes a kick from the
On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 9/21/11 5:37 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
wrote:
Personally, I think the occupant which loss admin privs to a
member-only room ought to be kicked. Others might think
On 22 September 2011 00:46, Kurt Zeilenga kurt.zeile...@isode.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
However I would consider it reasonable in a members-only room for
removal from the Owners List or the Admins List to result in adding that
person to the Members
On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 22 September 2011 00:46, Kurt Zeilenga kurt.zeile...@isode.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
However I would consider it reasonable in a members-only room for
removal from the Owners List or the Admins
On 9/21/11 7:02 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 22 September 2011 00:46, Kurt Zeilenga kurt.zeile...@isode.com
wrote:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
However I would consider it reasonable in a members-only room
for
While XEP 45, Section 9.4 is reasonable clear that loss of membership causes a
kick from the room, Section 10.7 is less clear of what happens on loss of admin
privs.
10.7 says:
If the user is in the room, the service MUST then send updated presence from
this individual to all occupants,
12 matches
Mail list logo
