Ralph Meijer wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:30:26AM +0800, Brett Zamir wrote:
[..]
Since having a @type on message is recommended and as the other types don't
seem to apply, should Pubsub recommend use of message type=headline for all
of its messages?
As I mentioned in another thread
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:30:26AM +0800, Brett Zamir wrote:
[..]
Since having a @type on message is recommended and as the other types don't
seem to apply, should Pubsub recommend use of message type=headline for all
of its messages?
As I mentioned in another thread the other day, the
Kevin Smith wrote:
Per the RFC3921 (including the newer draft), when message type is
normal, presumably appropriate for something like an email, it is
stated that A receiving client SHOULD present the message in an
interface enabling the recipient to reply, but without a conversation
history.
On Thu Oct 9 22:30:26 2008, Brett Zamir wrote:
Since having a @type on message is recommended and as the other
types don't seem to apply, should Pubsub recommend use of message
type=headline for all of its messages? If so (as really seems
necessary if one type is to be chosen since the
