On 09/16/2013 02:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/13/13 11:47 AM, Justin Karneges wrote:
On 06/13/2013 10:18 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/13/13 8:40 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
I don't necessarily have a problem with this as a
protocol-level diagnostic tool; it can help users (or rather,
t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ old thread alert ]
On 6/13/13 11:47 AM, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 10:18 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 6/13/13 8:40 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
>>> wrote:
>>>
-BEGIN PGP
On 06/13/2013 10:18 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/13/13 8:40 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 6/6/13 6:40 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 6 June 2013 10:21, Simon Tennant
wrote:
End to end encrypt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/13/13 11:33 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> Am 13.06.2013 19:18, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>> Yes, that is true, and I too don't want people to read more into
>> the results than is justified. I will keep that very much in mind
>> as I work on the ne
Am 13.06.2013 19:18, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
Yes, that is true, and I too don't want people to read more into the
results than is justified. I will keep that very much in mind as I
work on the next revision.
It seems that this could be easily achieved by splitting this up:
1) a query for ask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/13/13 8:40 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 6/6/13 6:40 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>> On 6 June 2013 10:21, Simon Tennant
>>> wrote:
On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/6/13 6:40 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On 6 June 2013 10:21, Simon Tennant wrote:
>>> End to end encryption is a worth goal. This is very cool for
>>> getting information on the s2s c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/6/13 6:40 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 6 June 2013 10:21, Simon Tennant wrote:
>> End to end encryption is a worth goal. This is very cool for
>> getting information on the s2s connection.
>
> Perhaps on first sight. However this kind of usage i
On 6 June 2013 21:12, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> I personally think trying to answer of a question about user-to-user security
> when security relies on non-E2E security mechanisms is a futile exercise.
> But I do think my cringe can largely be dealt with through appropriately
> stated security c
On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've been thinking I'd like to resurrect the Hop Check proposal
> (because after further reflection I think it would be useful, even if
> not perfect):
>
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-
On 6 June 2013 10:21, Simon Tennant wrote:
> End to end encryption is a worth goal. This is very cool for getting
> information on the s2s connection.
Perhaps on first sight. However this kind of usage is exactly why the
XEP died last time around. It isn't suitable for anything except
purely info
End to end encryption is a worth goal. This is very cool for getting
information on the s2s connection.
XEP-0219 makes a lot of assumptions about the network topology always
involving the traditional c2s design.
How might this XEP report meaningful information back to the user in the
following si
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> I've been thinking I'd like to resurrect the Hop Check proposal
>> (because after further reflection I think it would be useful, even if
>> not perfect):
>>
>
> for debugging/support? +1
>
>
I've not checked back to see whether I liked this o
I've been thinking I'd like to resurrect the Hop Check proposal
(because after further reflection I think it would be useful, even if
not perfect):
for debugging/support? +1
[...]
Before I post an updated version, does anyone have requests for data
they'd like to see included in the data forma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been thinking I'd like to resurrect the Hop Check proposal
(because after further reflection I think it would be useful, even if
not perfect):
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0219.html
Before I post an updated version, does anyone have requests f
15 matches
Mail list logo
