-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/25/09 9:05 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:35 AM, Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/25 Remko Tronçon re...@el-tramo.be:
Yep, which are the same actions, confusing users.
No, they're not, which was the point of
On Fri Sep 25 10:29:44 2009, Fabio Forno wrote:
Re-reading XEP-0050 for an implementation issue I've found nothing
that forbids sending the actions next/ and complete/ together.
Imho it is a nonsense and I think nobody uses it, but for better
clarification and better user interfaces (I've seen
Is that kind of structure commonly used for short-cuts in wizards, and
suchlike?
Unfortunately, it is. Horrible UI: there's no way of knowing what is
behind 'next' unless you press it, so you basically have to press it
anyway (unless you know your way around the wizard like a pro, and
remember
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Fri Sep 25 10:29:44 2009, Fabio Forno wrote:
Re-reading XEP-0050 for an implementation issue I've found nothing
that forbids sending the actions next/ and complete/ together.
Imho it is a nonsense and I think nobody
2009/9/25 Remko Tronçon re...@el-tramo.be:
Yep, which are the same actions, confusing users.
No, they're not, which was the point of my rant. Next gets you on to
more advanced settings, whereas Finish just says Skip the next
screens, the defaults are fine for me.
There are less horrible
There are less horrible scenarios, too.
Good point.
cheers,
Remko
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:35 AM, Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/25 Remko Tronçon re...@el-tramo.be:
Yep, which are the same actions, confusing users.
No, they're not, which was the point of my rant. Next gets you on
to
more advanced settings, whereas Finish just says Skip
