Hi,
I wonder if someone has a comment on it. Joe and Dave suggested a
framing parameter to use BEEP instead of what I created. Since BEEP
sounds ok to me, there is no reason for a framing parameter and just use
BEEP.
Dirk Meyer wrote:
After reading BEEP again...
Dirk Meyer wrote:
Dave
Hi,
sorry for the late answer -- stupid PhD thesis
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Fri Apr 24 16:31:20 2009, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
Sorry I'm so far behind. Any chance XEP-265 could have a framing
parameter in the Jingle portion? Some folks might like to just use
BEEP instead of the framing
Sorry I'm so far behind. Any chance XEP-265 could have a framing
parameter in the Jingle portion? Some folks might like to just use
BEEP instead of the framing mechanism specified in the XEP.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:19 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org wrote:
The XMPP Extensions
On Fri Apr 24 16:31:20 2009, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
Sorry I'm so far behind. Any chance XEP-265 could have a framing
parameter in the Jingle portion? Some folks might like to just use
BEEP instead of the framing mechanism specified in the XEP.
Or at least a BEEP-lite - we (Isode) may actually
Andreas Monitzer wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 13:09, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Yes, maybe restrict the usage to a stanza and not allow it inside a
stanza by default. So a client MAY send any return from any XEP out of
band, but only the whole result. If out of band is allowed somewehere
deep inside a
Hi,
On Mar 14, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: OutOfBand Stream Data
Abstract: This specification defines how to send parts of an XML
stream over a direct connection between peers.
On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:42, Pedro Melo wrote:
I like the framing part, as expected :).
But why such a specific protocol? Why not just open a peer-to-peer
XMPP stream and route everything between the two endpoints through
it? You could even reuse end-to-end encryption XEPs.
Because then
Andreas Monitzer wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:42, Pedro Melo wrote:
I like the framing part, as expected :).
But why such a specific protocol? Why not just open a peer-to-peer
XMPP stream and route everything between the two endpoints through
it? You could even reuse end-to-end encryption
Andreas Monitzer wrote:
Why use a non-existing protocol as an example, when you could use the
well-known discovery protocol for it?
Simple, I did not thought about that :) I had my future media server XEP
in mind, but XEP-0030 can also serve as an example. All the item
listings can be very
On Mar 16, 2009, at 13:09, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Yes, maybe restrict the usage to a stanza and not allow it inside a
stanza by default. So a client MAY send any return from any XEP out of
band, but only the whole result. If out of band is allowed somewehere
deep inside a stanza it SHOULD be added
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Mon Mar 16 14:43:38 2009, Andreas Monitzer wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 13:09, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Yes, maybe restrict the usage to a stanza and not allow it inside a
stanza by default. So a client MAY send any return from any XEP
out of
band, but only the whole result.
11 matches
Mail list logo
