Re: [PATCH] crtxn.o (Intel C++ 9.0) - crtend.o (Intel C++ 9.1)

2007-02-19 Thread Liviu Nicoara
Martin Sebor wrote: Liviu Nicoara wrote: The diff conditional got truncated in the copy paste: [...] So does this mean Intel renamed crtxn.o to crtend.o between 9.0 and 9.1? Intel tells me (in issue 355260) they have an undocumented compiler option -cxxlib-nostd that will apparently let us

Re: [PATCH] crtxn.o (Intel C++ 9.0) - crtend.o (Intel C++ 9.1)

2007-02-19 Thread Martin Sebor
Liviu Nicoara wrote: Liviu Nicoara wrote: Martin Sebor wrote: Liviu Nicoara wrote: The diff conditional got truncated in the copy paste: [...] So does this mean Intel renamed crtxn.o to crtend.o between 9.0 and 9.1? Intel tells me (in issue 355260) they have an undocumented compiler option

Intel 8.x, 9.x -cxxlib-nostd change, was: Re: [PATCH] crtxn.o (Intel C++ 9.0) - crtend.o (Intel C++ 9.1)

2007-02-19 Thread Liviu Nicoara
Here it is. I have grouped the options which required change together. I could not test the change with 8.1 and 9.0 compilers but I will do that as soon as our sysadmins resolve my account issues. On a side note: I could not detect any changes brought in by the -Xc option which I believe to

[PATCH] crtxn.o (Intel C++ 9.0) - crtend.o (Intel C++ 9.1)

2007-02-15 Thread Liviu Nicoara
2007-02-15 lnicoara [EMAIL PROTECTED] * etc/config/icc.config: Added conditional to handle name differences for crt object between Intel C++ 9.0 and 9.1. Liviu Index: etc/config/icc.config === ---

Re: [PATCH] crtxn.o (Intel C++ 9.0) - crtend.o (Intel C++ 9.1)

2007-02-15 Thread Liviu Nicoara
The diff conditional got truncated in the copy paste: Liviu Nicoara wrote: [...] +ifeq ($(shell [ $(CXX_MAJOR) -ge 9 -o $(CXX_MAJOR) -eq 9 -a $(CXX_MINOR) -ge 1 ] Here it is again: 2007-02-15 lnicoara [EMAIL PROTECTED] * etc/config/icc.config Added conditional to handle