On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 08:51:24PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:23:11AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > I don't mind some preprocessor magic as well as a prefix, but FFI_ prefix
> > looks quite specific
>
> Could you please elaborate? What do you mean by "specifi
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:23:11AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> I don't mind some preprocessor magic as well as a prefix, but FFI_ prefix
> looks quite specific
Could you please elaborate? What do you mean by "specific"?
> while different parts of strace could benefit from
> uniformly named ST
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 02:55:43AM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:36:41AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Do we need so many different stringify macros?
> > Could we harmonize them somehow?
>
> Well, we can't just place them into defs.h because sysent.h, but not
>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:36:41AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Do we need so many different stringify macros?
> Could we harmonize them somehow?
Well, we can't just place them into defs.h because sysent.h, but not
defs.h, is included by some tests/ files.
We could move all the STRINGIFY/#ifde
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 03:35:01PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:46:22PM +, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> > Well, I don't consider having a commonly used stringification macro a
> > namespace pollution.
>
> But that's exactly what's happened -- I chose a name wi
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:46:22PM +, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> Well, I don't consider having a commonly used stringification macro a
> namespace pollution.
But that's exactly what's happened -- I chose a name without prefix,
#undef'd it at the end of the header, and relied on that it woul
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:39:25PM +, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov
> > wrote:
> > > Overall looks good.
> >
> > Well, except that mpers_defs.h also has STRINGIFY() m
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Victor Krapivensky
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:39:25PM +, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov
>> wrote:
>> > Overall looks good.
>>
>> Well, except that mpers_defs.h also has STRINGIFY() macro and
>> un
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:39:25PM +, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > Overall looks good.
>
> Well, except that mpers_defs.h also has STRINGIFY() macro and
> undef'ing it in defs_reuse.h leads to breaking of mpers header
> generat
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:28:53PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> Do you really consider multiple -l arguments in a command line an error
> incompatible with continuation of strace execution?
Well, yes. We don't support multiple scripts, and specifying multiple -l
arguments is a usage error.
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> Overall looks good.
Well, except that mpers_defs.h also has STRINGIFY() macro and
undef'ing it in defs_reuse.h leads to breaking of mpers header
generation and breaking of the (clean) build, as a result. I'd suggest
renaming STRINGIFY
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:17:29PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> * Makefile.am: Build with LuaJIT if configured so.
> (strace_SOURCES): Add defs_reuse.h.
> * configure.ac: Add new --with-luajit configure option.
> * defs.h: Move code that needs to be fed to LuaJIT's FFI to...
> * defs_reuse.h:
* Makefile.am: Build with LuaJIT if configured so.
(strace_SOURCES): Add defs_reuse.h.
* configure.ac: Add new --with-luajit configure option.
* defs.h: Move code that needs to be fed to LuaJIT's FFI to...
* defs_reuse.h: ...new file.
* strace.c: Initial support for Lua scripting.
(init): New -l op
13 matches
Mail list logo
