On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 06:59:04PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I've done scratch builds for Fedora 10 and 12 (x86_64, i386, ppc64, ppc),
available here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_1742936/
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_1742937/
(The build system
On Monday 12 October 2009 16:36:43 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:18:26PM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 04:31:38PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
[...] Are we about ready to go now?
Yes, everything looks OK, except build failure on Debian sparc.
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 04:48:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 09 October 2009 07:42:19 Frederik Schüler wrote:
thanks fot the patch, with a small fix, the 32bit strace binary on sparc
builds now [...] but the 64bit binary fails:
gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
Hi!
The addressed issue is fixed now, thanks!
But we got another issue open:
gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc64 -I../linux/sparc64 -Ilinux -
I../linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT util.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/util.Tpo -c -o util.o
../util.c
../util.c: In function ‘printcall’:
../util.c:1254:
On Monday 12 October 2009 10:04:42 Frederik Schüler wrote:
But we got another issue open:
gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc64 -I../linux/sparc64
-Ilinux - I../linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT util.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/util.Tpo
-c -o util.o ../util.c
../util.c: In function
Hi!
Now it builds both the 32 and 64bit strace binaries on sparc64, thanks!
Best regards
Frederik Schüler
On Monday 12 October 2009 16:19:07 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 12 October 2009 10:04:42 Frederik Schüler wrote:
But we got another issue open:
gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:27:23PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
Now it builds both the 32 and 64bit strace binaries on sparc64, thanks!
Does it also work there? ;)
--
ldv
pgpZDJQmsXeQn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 12 October 2009 10:34:57 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:27:23PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
Now it builds both the 32 and 64bit strace binaries on sparc64, thanks!
Does it also work there? ;)
it works for me in sparc32 userland
-mike
signature.asc
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:49:30AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Yes, there are no problem, at least for those who just build strace from
tarball. But there are people who still list tarball contents before use.
Maybe it's some kind of a taste, but for me it would be a bit more fair if
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:48:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I propose to build release tarballs from clean checked out source, and
to set file timestamps right after checkout, e.g.
git clone /path/to/strace.git
cd strace
git-set-file-times
autoreconf -i
./configure
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:01:56AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:48:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I propose to build release tarballs from clean checked out source, and
to set file timestamps right after checkout, e.g.
git clone /path/to/strace.git
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 07:03:14PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Mike Frysinger already submitted a fix for this issue, I'm going to check
it on x86 and x86-64, and merge it if everything is OK.
Ok.
Another small issue is file timestamps in release tarball.
Since git does not store
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:00:50PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
[...]
and on sparc:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc -I../linux/sparc -Ilinux
-I../linux
-Wall -g -O2 -MT syscall.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/syscall.Tpo -c -o syscall.o
../syscall.c
[...]
../syscall.c: In function
On Thursday 08 October 2009 19:14:13 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:00:50PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
[...]
and on sparc:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc -I../linux/sparc -Ilinux
-I../linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT syscall.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/syscall.Tpo -c
Hi!
On Friday 09 October 2009 01:14:13 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On sparc, it is defined as static struct regs regs;
Nothing has changed in this area since v4.5.18.
Yes, still barfing:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc -I../linux/sparc -Ilinux -I../linux
-Wall -g -O2 -MT syscall.o
On Thursday 08 October 2009 21:09:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 08 October 2009 20:33:31 Frederik Schüler wrote:
On Friday 09 October 2009 01:14:13 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On sparc, it is defined as static struct regs regs;
Nothing has changed in this area since v4.5.18.
Yes,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:05:32PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
I committed some nits to make for a happy make distcheck (d087571). After
that, everything looks good to me.
I noticed a compilation warning on x86:
util.c: In function 'do_ptrace':
util.c:260: warning: passing argument 4 of
Hi!
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 03:05:32 Roland McGrath wrote:
I'd like Frederik and Andreas to reply that they see no problems, and then
I'll tag it and push out to sourceforge and Fedora. In the next cycle, I
would be pleased to have Andreas and/or Dmitry do either or both of those
last
Hi Andreas,
the fix works, thanks.
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 16:44:33 Andreas Schwab wrote:
I've pushed this change:
From 0fda1c59cc707918b7d5de9c516c629d0abb4f3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Schwab sch...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:00:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix
Mike Frysinger already submitted a fix for this issue, I'm going to check
it on x86 and x86-64, and merge it if everything is OK.
Ok.
Another small issue is file timestamps in release tarball.
Since git does not store timestamps, all files will have current mtime
after checkout, while we
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 22:03:14 Roland McGrath wrote:
Another small issue is file timestamps in release tarball.
Since git does not store timestamps, all files will have current mtime
after checkout, while we still package files with last modification in
previous century (e.g.
That all looks good to me. Go ahead and merge it. If Frederik has any
more tweaks to add, just commit those on top.
Thanks,
Roland
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
[...]
I have verified that upstream strace HEAD works correctly on hppa.
Good news. Looks like everything is ready for 4.5.19 release?
--
ldv
pgpaN6COQs6ry.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:10:48AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:04:45AM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
[...]
I attached my current diff, you might want to crosscheck, waiting for
debian
hppa porters to confirm the issues are fixed.
Is there any
It's been long enough already. Whatever the particulars, we can't keep
waiting. I want to see the release this week.
Thanks,
Roland
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only
On Monday 05 October 2009 11:45:28 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:10:48AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:04:45AM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
[...]
I attached my current diff, you might want to crosscheck, waiting for
debian hppa porters
Hi!
I did the checks myself now, thanks to debian porters machines.
armel build fixes confirmed.
hppa issues fixed and tested, patch attached.
I hope the format is ok, this is my first official git commit ;)
Best regards
Frederik Schüler
On Monday 05 October 2009 17:45:28 Dmitry V. Levin
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:30:07AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:10:09PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
I did the checks myself now, thanks to debian porters machines.
armel build fixes confirmed.
hppa issues fixed and tested, patch attached.
I hope the
Roland McGrath rol...@redhat.com writes:
Andreas, please look it over. It also wouldn't hurt to do a round-up of
the open Fedora bugs, make sure the ones fixed in this release are
mentioned in the log so we close them with the Fedora update, and list here
pending ones not yet fixed so we can
AFAICS all fedora bugs are covered, the only major issue left is the
SIGTRAP handling.
Great! I think we should leave that slightly hairy issue for after this
release, so I think we are about ready to go. It would sure be nice to
hear from Frederik...
Thanks,
Roland
Hi!
On Monday 21 September 2009 22:40:34 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520084
I believe it was fixed already, so I added closes: #520084 to the
debian/changelog file last Monday.
Yes confirmed, the patch is already in git.
I attached my current
Done, please review:
http://strace.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=strace/strace;a=commitdiff;h=ldv/release
I probably missed some noteworthy changes, feel free to add/correct.
Looks good to me! Thanks! Go ahead and merge it and we can add any
follow-on changes as needed.
Andreas,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:16:50AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:25:13PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Two months ago I said that I'd like to see reintroduced one change (which
was lost with big revert commit) made by Denys: Replace many more bare
ptrace calls
33 matches
Mail list logo
