On the source forge page of Stripes I see the text:
"Source forge description: It's stripey and it doesn't suck"
I don't know what 'stripey' is, but I think 'suck' is really inappropriate
language for a serious product as The Stripes Framework...
http://sourceforge.net/projects/stripes/
--
> On the source forge page of Stripes I see the text:
>
> "Source forge description: It's stripey and it doesn't suck"
>
> I don't know what 'stripey' is, but I think 'suck' is really
> inappropriate
> language for a serious product as The Stripes Framework...
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects
Souvenirs, souvenirs... To be honest I someimes miss those endless threads
on TSS, was quite funny over there at the time. Now it's just advertisement
and ohter bullshit.
Cheers
Remi - and Rolf...
2010/10/28 Freddy Daoud
> > On the source forge page of Stripes I see the text:
> >
> > "Source f
On 27-10-2010 at 21:27, Freddy Daoud wrote:
> So, after all the brou-ha-ha-ha-ha of getting Stripes back
> into action, let's hear suggestions for a new, catchy, witty,
> smart, attractive tagline.
>
> Don't ask for mine, I've already used it for a book title ;)
One option:
Stripes... the skidmar
On a more serious note... I agree with Karen.
In fact... IMO its always better in marketing to differentiate yourself
(and speak to your audience) with what you do well...
How about something like:
"Stripes: The robust and intuitive Java web framework"
--Nikolaos
> 2010/10/28 Freddy Daoud ma
What about:
Stripes - because it's simple
Den 28/10/2010 22.14 skrev "Nikolaos Giannopoulos" :
On a more serious note... I agree with Karen.
In fact... IMO its always better in marketing to differentiate yourself
(and speak to your audience) with what you do well...
How about something like:
"S
I like it.
On Oct 28, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Søren Pedersen wrote:
> What about:
> Stripes - because it's simple
>
>
>> Den 28/10/2010 22.14 skrev "Nikolaos Giannopoulos"
>> :
>>
>> On a more serious note... I agree with Karen.
>>
>> In fact... IMO its always better in marketing to differentiate
the other thing that people keep talking about is how Stripes is (or nearly is)
"feature complete". So how about:
Stripes - simple & complete.
On Oct 28, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Søren Pedersen wrote:
> What about:
> Stripes - because it's simple
>
>
>> Den 28/10/2010 22.14 skrev "Nikolaos Gianno
I like it!
On Oct 28, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Evan Leonard wrote:
>
> the other thing that people keep talking about is how Stripes is (or nearly
> is) "feature complete". So how about:
>
> Stripes - simple & complete.
>
>
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Søren Pedersen wrote:
>
>> What about:
>>
Many take from the word "simple" alone to imply "not feature rich".
So adding some sort of qualifier is great but I am not sure that
"complete" is the word.
Nothing in software is ever "complete" unfortunately.
(Not trying to start a flame war with those that believe Stripes is
complete...
I ju
Along that vein, you could do something like
Stripes: simply rich.
Joel
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Nikolaos Giannopoulos <
nikol...@brightminds.org> wrote:
> Many take from the word "simple" alone to imply "not feature rich".
> So adding some sort of qualifier is great but I am not sure t
I keep thinking of the headline for Grails "The search is over". At one
point saying "look no further" and at another pointing to the fact that
people have been for the holy grail for thousands of years.
That's a good one.
It would be cool if we hit something with more than one dimension :)
Den 28
When I used Stripes for the first time, my initial thought was... "This is
the missing thing I've been looking for." Every Java-based web framework I
looked at either had a piece missing or had too much things that I didn't
need.
I'm not the best tag-line person, but I propose something that indi
On 29-10-2010 at 09:11, Rick Grashel wrote:
> When I used Stripes for the first time, my initial thought was... "This is
> the missing thing I've been looking for." Every Java-based web framework I
> looked at either had a piece missing or had too much things that I didn't
> need.
>
> I'm not the
Or
Stripes - the one to rule them all
;-)
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in pr
or maybe:
Stripes: What's needed, nothing more.
On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind wrote:
> On 29-10-2010 at 09:11, Rick Grashel wrote:
>> When I used Stripes for the first time, my initial thought was... "This is
>> the missing thing I've been looking for." Every Java
Stripes - just what you're looking for.
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes
I love that :))
Den 01/11/2010 21.57 skrev "Grzegorz Krugły" :
Stripes - just what you're looking for.
--
Nokia and AT&T prese...
--
Nokia and
(Apologies for replying to an old thread, I'm reading old email.)
For some of, perhaps the older ones, the word sucks is simply a shortened form
of sucks dick. So it has undesirable sexual connotations.
On 2010-10-29 09:53, M.C.S. wrote:
> Well, I still like the current tagline. I give a **it
19 matches
Mail list logo
