DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3959] New: - Resource Properties, Connection Pool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html OptionsTag.java

craigmcc01/10/03 20:45:09 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html OptionsTag.java Log: Port fix to Bugzilla #3161 to HEAD branch. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +3 -0 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/OptionsTag.java Index: Option

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html OptionsTag.java

craigmcc01/10/03 20:44:17 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html Tag: STRUTS_1_0_BRANCH OptionsTag.java Log: If the property specified by the "property" attribute returns null, throw an error message that indicates what the real problem is, rather

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean CookieTei.java HeaderTei.java ParameterTei.java

craigmcc01/10/03 20:26:44 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean CookieTei.java HeaderTei.java ParameterTei.java Log: Port fix for Bugzilla #3148 to the HEAD branch. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +8 -7 jakarta-struts/src/share/org

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean CookieTei.java HeaderTei.java ParameterTei.java

craigmcc01/10/03 20:25:32 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean Tag: STRUTS_1_0_BRANCH CookieTei.java HeaderTei.java ParameterTei.java Log: Correct the generated scripting variable type when the , , or tag is used with th

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionMapping.java

craigmcc01/10/03 20:02:27 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionMapping.java Log: Port fix for Bugzilla #2226 to HEAD branch. Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +12 -5 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/ActionMapping.java Index: ActionMap

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionMapping.java

craigmcc01/10/03 20:01:18 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action Tag: STRUTS_1_0_BRANCH ActionMapping.java Log: Avoid a NullPointerException in corner cases caused by failed initialization of ActionServlet. PR: Bugzilla #2226 Submitted by: Marti

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java

craigmcc01/10/03 19:54:04 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java Log: Port fix for Bugzilla #2068 to HEAD branch. Revision ChangesPath 1.75 +6 -7 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet.java Index: ActionSer

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java

craigmcc01/10/03 19:51:56 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action Tag: STRUTS_1_0_BRANCH ActionServlet.java Log: Unconditionally pass the selected mapping as a request attribute under key Action.MAPPING_KEY, even if no form bean is specified. PR: B

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/workflow RegistryServlet.java ActivityAction.java

husted 01/10/03 19:12:02 Added: contrib/workflow RegistryServlet.java ActivityAction.java Log: Working drafts of an ActivityAction and RegistryServlet to integrate Struts with the new workflow proposal. These are early-release alpha files, but I thought I woudl get them up whe

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/workflow - New directory

husted 01/10/03 19:09:05 jakarta-struts/contrib/workflow - New directory

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3957] - Dummy bug to test mailing list notification

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3957] New: - Dummy bug to test mailing list notification

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bugzilla Bug Reports

On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 18:05:25 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bugzilla Bug Reports > > I like this idea. Then I don't have to check Bugzilla for new bugs any more. > > Will this c

Re: Bugzilla Bug Reports

Originally, I think we did that just to leverage bugilla's automatic mail feature. Posting them to DEV and leaving them unassigned would seem to be a better fit with the meritocratic model. Jakarta Committers are all jointly and severally responsible for everything in their codebase. It is expecte

Re: Bugzilla Bug Reports

Sounds good. I plan to start helping out with bugs and features on the Struts core after I get the next version of the Struts Console out (due in about a week). -james --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Finally getting to breathe for a few minutes, I'm > goin

Re: Bugzilla Bug Reports

I like this idea. Then I don't have to check Bugzilla for new bugs any more. Will this change affect the initial assignment of new bugs? Currently, they are automatically assigned to the component owner. I feel a little uncomfortable, sometimes, swiping bugs from other people's lists, so I'd like

Re: Bugzilla Bug Reports

+1 "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Finally getting to breathe for a few minutes, I'm going to start whacking > off a few of the outstanding Bugzilla bug reports against Struts > (particularly 1.0-final related issues). While doing this, I'd like to > suggest that we do what seve

Bugzilla Bug Reports

Hi Folks, Finally getting to breathe for a few minutes, I'm going to start whacking off a few of the outstanding Bugzilla bug reports against Struts (particularly 1.0-final related issues). While doing this, I'd like to suggest that we do what several other Jakarta projects are doing, and have n

Re: Workflow Management

On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:04:42 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Workflow Management > > I've spent some time with this, and it's a truly stellar package ;-) > Thanks ;-) > Any plans regarding the Regis

session.invalidate()..... weblogic6.1

Hi all, I implemented a custom Realm and config Weblogic6.1 to use this Realm for my web application that use Form base authentication. Every thing works fine, I was able to config my web.xml to make sure that user is authenticated before that access secure resource. Until I update the current

Re: Workflow Management

I've spent some time with this, and it's a truly stellar package ;-) Any plans regarding the Registry interface and base class? For testing purposes, I put one together using Activities as a base (annexed), and reserved namespace for adding processes later. The base class implements a FastHashMap

Antigen found =*.vcf file

Antigen for Exchange found Matthias.Gries.vcf matching =*.vcf file filter. The file is currently Deleted. The message, "Some questions regarding data validation!", was sent from Matthias Gries and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at IBC/PA1/MG01. ...