Validation on DynamicForm problem

2002-06-25 Thread @Basebeans.com
Subject: Validation on DynamicForm problem From: "Tomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === Hello, how, to make verification (validation) of dynamic forms ? in struts-config.xml is: . . . . . . in file validator.xml is: in web.xml is:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] - Using Tiles, resolves to location of layout JSP

2002-06-25 Thread Cedric Dumoulin
It is not a bug, as the tag behaves as its documentation says. But maybe we can improve / enhance the tag to be able to use it in the context of included pages (like tiles). An idea is to add an optional attribute "path". If this attribute is specified, output the root URL of current web a

Re: Validation on DynamicForm problem

2002-06-25 Thread Matt Raible
You might try matching up your form names in your validation.xml file: Should be "logonForm" according to struts-config.xml. HTH, Matt --- Struts-dev Newsgroup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Subject: Validation on DynamicForm problem > From: "Tomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > === >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10191] - Validator Range Checking Bug

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] - Using Tiles, resolves to location of layout JSP

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Newsletter Submissions]

2002-06-25 Thread Ted Husted
In case anyone is interested in handling this ... Original Message Subject: [PROPOSAL] Newsletter Submissions Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:46:57 +0100 From: "Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Id like to p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10163] - struts-validator.war, set-property documentation/example are conflicting

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10217] New: - LookupDispatchAction doesn't use new exception handling provided by the standard "execute" of other actions

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10217] - LookupDispatchAction doesn't use new exception handling provided by the standard "execute" of other actions

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8022] - Need to update the Actions in the actions package for 1.1

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Nightly Build JavaDocs

2002-06-25 Thread James Holmes
The nightly build JavaDocs appear to be out of sync. Do these get updated automagically each night when the builds are created? If not, can someone with website update privilege update these? Thanks, -james [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/ _

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes-1.1-b1.xml

2002-06-25 Thread husted
husted 2002/06/25 08:19:51 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes-1.1-b1.xml Log: Additonal updates to the release notes for 1.1 -- still a lot to do though. Especially need better verbiage for the Validator, Tiles, Nesting additions, and a summary of the whiz-bang enhancements t

Re: Nightly Build JavaDocs

2002-06-25 Thread Ted Husted
My understanding was that there was an automatic process running someplace that did that. If this is not the case, then I'll start updating the HTML for those too. In any event, I just posted a current copy. James Holmes wrote: > > The nightly build JavaDocs appear to be out of sync. > Do these

Re: Nightly Build JavaDocs

2002-06-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:24:55 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Nightly Build JavaDocs > > My un

Re: Nightly Build JavaDocs

2002-06-25 Thread Ted Husted
Yes unpacking the struts-documenation.war still works (though, I've just been scp'ing things up as needed lately). If it started unpacking the war for us, it would save a step. "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:24:55 -0400

multipart requests + forwarding = bug

2002-06-25 Thread Rob Leland
I haven't experienced this bug but my office mate mentioned he experienced it, he is not here today. There also seems to been some discussion, and several different patches floating around to fix this. If this is still a problem could someone who has experienced this file a BUG report at http://n

RE: multipart requests + forwarding = bug

2002-06-25 Thread Hal Deadman
The subject of this email doesn't seem to match the body but if you are referring to bug reports about the multipart requests and forwarding, there are a couple in bugzilla already. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8732 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9760 (dupl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10217] - LookupDispatchAction doesn't use new exception handling provided by the standard "execute" of other actions

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5966] - Add ActionForward as target for ActionForm

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10217] - LookupDispatchAction doesn't use new exception handling provided by the standard "execute" of other actions

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] - Using Tiles, resolves to location of layout JSP

2002-06-25 Thread Byrne, Steven
I'd definitely be +1 for something along the lines of what Cedric suggests -- I ended up making my own html:base subclass that just uses the context path followed by a /, and that works great, but I understand that it's not a fully general solution. > -Original Message- > From: Cedric D

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10217] - LookupDispatchAction doesn't use new exception handling provided by the standard "execute" of other actions

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions SwitchAction.java LookupDispatchAction.java DispatchAction.java

2002-06-25 Thread husted
husted 2002/06/25 11:26:15 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions SwitchAction.java LookupDispatchAction.java DispatchAction.java Log: JavaDoc updates for execute versus perform. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +5 -5 jakarta-struts/src

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator TypeAction.java RegistrationAction.java MultiRegistrationAction.java LocaleAction.java

2002-06-25 Thread husted
husted 2002/06/25 11:26:57 Modified:src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator TypeAction.java RegistrationAction.java MultiRegistrationAction.java LocaleAction.java Log: Updates for execute versus perform. Revision Change

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util StrutsValidatorUtil.java StrutsValidator.java

2002-06-25 Thread husted
husted 2002/06/25 11:27:52 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util StrutsValidatorUtil.java StrutsValidator.java Log: JavaDoc updates for 1.1. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +46 -46 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util/StrutsVali

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator ValidatorForm.java

2002-06-25 Thread husted
husted 2002/06/25 11:28:28 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator ValidatorForm.java Log: JavaDoc updates for 1.1. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +5 -5 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/ValidatorForm.java Index: ValidatorForm.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10227] New: - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8732] - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly (was Fileupload with Bea Weblogic 6.1 Sp2 throws an exception

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10227] - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8732] - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly (was Fileupload with Bea Weblogic 6.1 Sp2 throws an exception

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8732] - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly (was Fileupload with Bea Weblogic 6.1 Sp2 throws an exception

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8732] - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly (was Fileupload with Bea Weblogic 6.1 Sp2 throws an exception

2002-06-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu