tricky issue - non serializable DiskFile (bug?)

Hi All, I posted time ago the following thread. http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg35781.html with no responses. It reports about DiskFile objects not been serializables. AFAIK, in persisted environments, container must serialize session data to maintain session st

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5286] - struts logic:redirect tag not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: The state of 1.1 Beta 2

For what I am worth, I would agree with fixing the blank-webapp... I encountered this early on and it was very frusterating when I started learning struts (i assumed the blank-app was configured correctly). -Original Message- From: jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, Augu

RE: The state of 1.1 Beta 2

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:05:07 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: The state of 1.1 Beta 2 > > > For what I am worth, I would agree with fixing the blank-web

RE: The state of 1.1 Beta 2

When you find a problem like this, *please* submit a bug report for it. That's the best way to ensure that it gets fixed. The only bug report we have for this is bug #10955, which states that the app does not run under JRun 3.1. I don't have access to that container, so I did not attempt to addre

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11642] New: - attribute "width" missing for "select" HTML tag (html:select)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11642] - attribute "width" missing for "select" HTML tag (html:select)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: The state of 1.1 Beta 2

For the tiles-documentation, it will be an issue for the 1.1 final release. I am not sure it is for a b2 release. I will correct it asap, but I don't know when I will find enough time to do it. As again, any help and patches are welcomes ;-). Cedric Martin Cooper wrote: >The CVS tree wa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11574] - Nested logic tags are brittle

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11574] - Nested logic tags are brittle

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: The state of 1.1 Beta 2

I think as much as we would like to think that new users trying out Struts will understand what the term "beta" means, I believe reality is that there will be a lot of negative impressions formed by having what's very likely to be the first webapp that newbies will try out fail on them. It gives

RE: The state of 1.1 Beta 2

Here's the bottom line ... the number of bugs yet to be found is infinite. Waiting for "one more bugfix" is just as bad as waiting for "one more feature" -- we might as well be waiting for Godot :-). If someone wants these two issues addressed before Beta 2, someone had better supply a patch. Ot

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes-1.1-b2.xml

martinc 2002/08/12 21:32:09 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes-1.1-b2.xml Log: Add known issues remaining in Struts 1.1 Beta 2. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +60 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes-1.1-b2.xml Index: release-notes-1.1-b2.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

martinc 2002/08/12 21:33:12 Modified:.build.xml Log: Reset build version for post 1.1 Beta 2. Revision ChangesPath 1.77 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file

Validator bug and release notes

If someone will just commit the (very small) patch attached to bug 11544, you can remove this item from the release notes: + Validator does not successfully validate empty date fields. + (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10349";>#10349) + it fixes t

RE: Validator bug and release notes

James, Too late for Beta 2, I'm afraid. The release is being uploaded to the web server as I write this, and the Struts web site has already been updated, as has the Jakarta web site. If the two bugs you mention are duplicates, I would appreciate it if you could mark one of them as such. Thanks

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11544] - PATCH: Date validation not quite right

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Validator bug and release notes

At 02:05 AM 8/13/2002, Martin Cooper wrote: >James, > >Too late for Beta 2, I'm afraid. The release is being uploaded to the web >server as I write this, and the Struts web site has already been updated, as >has the Jakarta web site. *sigh* One little bracket... Anyway, could someone please com

RE: Validator bug and release notes

> -Original Message- > From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 11:12 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Validator bug and release notes > > > At 02:05 AM 8/13/2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > >James, > > > >Too late for Beta 2, I'm afraid.

RE: initConfigDigester refactoring?

Hi, the is similar to our "innermost" structure. Here is an excerpt from our dtd: The nice thing is that we allow nesting of parameters using the recursive elements and

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Beta 2 Released

The Struts team is proud to announce the release of Struts 1.1 Beta 2. This release includes significant new functionality, while retaining full backwards compatibility with earlier versions of Struts. It also incorporates fixes for a number of bugs which were reported against earlier versions. T

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10955] - Error running struts-blank applicaiton under JRun 3.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b