RE: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-19 Thread Jesse Alexander (KADA 11)
+1 BUT it must be configurable (have a config-switch to choose between behaviours) Alexander -Original Message- From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Donnerstag, 19. September 2002 19:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VOTE: Behavior of Validator As

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12323] - Powered by Struts

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9523] - Action and multiple roles

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12825] - Action "roles" attribute incorrectly parsed for comma-seperated roles

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12209] - tabindex isn't working

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html LinkTag.java

2002-09-19 Thread martinc
martinc 2002/09/19 21:33:13 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html LinkTag.java Log: Generate the 'tabindex' attribute, if it was specified. PR: 12209 Submitted by: Edwin van Nuil. Patch supplied by Antoni Reus - thanks! Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +9

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12647] - o.a.s.a.SwitchAction throws exception with incorrect message when expected parameters are not there.

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions LocalStrings.properties

2002-09-19 Thread martinc
martinc 2002/09/19 21:28:43 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions LocalStrings.properties Log: Correct exception message for required parameters to SwitchAction. PR: 12647 Submitted by: Eddie Bush - Thanks for the patch! Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +1 -1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12014] - html:image tld doesn't specify a "styleId" attribute

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12754] - html:image does not have a styleId attribute

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12634] - Struts 1.0.2 download contains tld files for 1.1 beta features

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2017] - Text entered in forms using multi-part/formdata cannot be utf8

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2757] - file upload problem: MultipartIterator: invalid multipart request data, doesn't start with boundary

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Adding bundle Attr to optionsCollection

2002-09-19 Thread Christopher Cheng
Is it possible to add a bundle attribute to optionsCollection so that if bundle is specified, the label attribute is used to retreive the corresponding bundle message from resource file? For example, the message key returns a key in MyMessage.properties. Similar method is already used in . I a

Re: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-19 Thread V. Cekvenich
+1 and thanks V. James Turner wrote: > As currently written, the Validator has what I consider a quirk. > > Suppose you have two fields, username and password. Username has > "depends=required" and password has "depends=required.notgod" (where > notgod is a test that makes sure that the u

Re: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-19 Thread Dave Derry
- Original Message - From: "James Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Precisely. Validation for a field should stop on the first error *for that > field* > > James > +1 I agree whole-heartedly with this. The way the Validator currently works is to iterate throught the validation rules, and

RE: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-19 Thread James Turner
At 02:02 PM 9/19/2002, Dominique Plante wrote: >+1 > >Good example, and I agree with your rationale. > >Under the new behavior following the example you gave for the second >case: >username=blank, password=god: one error generated on "required" > >Two errors should be generated: >username is requi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12825] New: - Action "roles" attribute incorrectly parsed for comma-seperated roles

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-19 Thread Christopher Seekamp

RE: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-19 Thread Dominique Plante
+1 Good example, and I agree with your rationale. Under the new behavior following the example you gave for the second case: username=blank, password=god: one error generated on "required" Two errors should be generated: username is required password cannot be god Is the new behavior that you

VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-19 Thread James Turner
As currently written, the Validator has what I consider a quirk. Suppose you have two fields, username and password. Username has "depends=required" and password has "depends=required.notgod" (where notgod is a test that makes sure that the user didn't choose god as a password). The followin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10191] - Validator Range Checking Bug

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12683] - validator-rules.xml has a neglect

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12821] - Password fields are not validated against minLength on javascript side

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12821] New: - Password fields are not validated against minLength on javascript side

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [Forward-Looking] Struts and JavaServer Faces

2002-09-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Jing Zhou wrote: > >[snip] > > * Transition one page at a time to use the new tag libraries, > > making an appropriate modification to the elements > > for your pages (the URL needs to change to meet Faces requirements). > > > > Could you provide a simple example t

RE: [Core] Truly global globa-forwards

2002-09-19 Thread Russ Bonsall
Just thought I would chime in as another developer that finds the idea of a hierarchy of modules most useful. Hopefully you don't find my comments to verbose. My company has decided to move forward with using Struts for one of our applications that is being migrated from a client-server app to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12819] New: - org.apache.struts.util.AppException should have protected properties instead of private properties

2002-09-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [VOTE] David M. Karr as a Struts Committer

2002-09-19 Thread Ted Husted
+1 Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > I'd like to propose David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer on > Struts. It's clear from his work on the EL library that he would be a > tremendous asset to the Struts development community (and not just for > these tags :-). > > Here's my +1. > > Crai

Re: How to extend AppException

2002-09-19 Thread Rob Leland
phpsurf wrote: > Hi > > when looking at the default ExceptionHandler implementation, I saw that > there was a special behaviour when handling > org.apache.struts.util.AppException. > ... > But the problem is that its properties are private instead of protected, so > it's quite difficult to add s

Re: [VOTE] David M. Karr as a Struts Committer

2002-09-19 Thread Rob Leland
+1 Rob Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > I'd like to propose David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer on -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: