DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18549] - Embedded tag raises JSP-Exception

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18549] New: - Embedded tag raises JSP-Exception

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18539] - tag-doc contrib's taglibreports should have sliding Headers

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc/src/resources/taglibreport xbPositionableElement.js index.xsl taglib-report.xsl

2003-03-31 Thread jmitchell
jmitchell2003/03/31 20:29:17 Modified:contrib/tag-doc/src/resources/taglibreport index.xsl taglib-report.xsl Added: contrib/tag-doc/src/resources/taglibreport xbPositionableElement.js Log: Applied patch by Mohan Kishore. Th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16788] - WML tag library for core Struts actions

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16788] - WML tag library for core Struts actions

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18538] - Tiles Tag Library's shortname should be 'tiles'

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-tiles.xml

2003-03-31 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/03/31 18:08:16 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-tiles.xml Log: Changed shortname to "tiles" for PR # 18538. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-tiles.xml Index: struts-tiles.xml ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16788] - WML tag library for core Struts actions

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16569] - Server side validation with Struts does not function

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16569] - Server side validation with Struts does not function

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12665] - Deprecation Enhancments.

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12665] - Deprecation Enhancments.

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18539] - tag-doc contrib's taglibreports should have sliding Headers

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18539] - tag-doc contrib's taglibreports should have sliding Headers

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18539] - tag-doc contrib's taglibreports should have sliding Headers

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18539] - tag-doc contrib's taglibreports should have sliding Headers

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18539] New: - tag-doc contrib's taglibreports should have sliding Headers

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18538] New: - Tiles Tag Library's shortname should be 'tiles'

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18343] - Nested tags cannot find bean in any scope in included JSP

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18343] - Nested tags cannot find bean in any scope in included JSP

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18343] - Nested tags cannot find bean in any scope in included JSP

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18343] - Nested tags cannot find bean in any scope in included JSP

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18343] - Nested tags cannot find bean in any scope in included JSP

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread David Graham
I wonder if the issue here is really about fonts. http://maven.apache.org/ ...it looks great on my work pc (IE on Win2k), but looks like crap on my laptop (RH8 with Mozilla) This is exactly my point. If you're using IE it's ok, but not other browsers. Mozilla has an irritating habit of renderi

Re: Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread James Mitchell
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:26, James Holmes wrote: > Well, we're all entitled to our own opinion. However, > mine differs from yours as I think the other format is > much clearer and easier to read. I wonder if the issue here is really about fonts. http://maven.apache.org/ ...it looks great o

Re: Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread David Graham
The sans-serif font is definitely better in the new format but they made the left navigation an eye chart. David From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Struts and Maven Date: Mon,

Re: Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread James Mitchell
If you search the archives, Craig has already commented on this. We haven't moved to this tool, IIRC, for the same reason some people have not adopted Struts 1.1..because it is still considered beta. On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:04, Joe Germuska wrote: > Has anyone else looked at developing a Ma

Re: Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread James Holmes
Well, we're all entitled to our own opinion. However, mine differs from yours as I think the other format is much clearer and easier to read. -James --- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I know this was brought up some time in the past > when > >I was looking at updating the Struts webs

Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 10:01 AM, Brandon Goodin wrote: I'm curious why you consider it such a problem. It has solved several issues for me. Quite the opposite. I rarely use the base Action class :-) LookupDispatchAction itself requires a tighter coupling between what is in the presentatio

Re: Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread David Graham
I know this was brought up some time in the past when I was looking at updating the Struts website to the "pretty" format generated by Maven. Perhaps there will be time and place for it once 1.1 is out. Do you mean the tiny, confusing, and unreadable format? -James David --- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL

Re: Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread James Holmes
I know this was brought up some time in the past when I was looking at updating the Struts website to the "pretty" format generated by Maven. Perhaps there will be time and place for it once 1.1 is out. -James --- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else looked at developing a M

Struts and Maven

2003-03-31 Thread Joe Germuska
Has anyone else looked at developing a Maven project.xml for Struts? I think it would be pretty handy, considering the number of dependencies Struts has. Mostly as an excuse for getting more familiar with the project.xml schema, I put together a partially-functioning POM for Struts this weeken

RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread Brandon Goodin
I'm curious why you consider it such a problem. It has solved several issues for me. Quite the opposite. I rarely use the base Action class :-) Brandon Goodin -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:07 AM To: Struts Developers List Su

Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread David Graham
I have made some needed changes and updates to the ValidatorLookupDispatchAction (scheduled for 1.2). But, I cannot decide on whether I should keep the name as ValidatorLookupDispatchAction (which is a mouthful) or change it to VLDAction (tight! baby!). What do you all think? -1 The longer name des

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18501] - Controller wipes out exisiting request form data

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread Erik Hatcher
good ol' LookupDispatchAction I know folks are using it and seem to like it, but I created it in the context of a project gone way wrong and now that I'm on to something bigger and better I have not used it at all, believe it or not. I just want to say "my apologies" to the Struts team for