Developers List
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for
Calendar Popup tag lib?)
--- Edgar Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the
tags as they
currently exist.
The best thing to do is to open a bugzilla enhancement
Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the tags as they
currently exist.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Paananen, Tero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 5:42 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for
: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 6:00 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for Calendar Popup
tag lib?)
--- Edgar Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the tags
The users of struts can understand 1.2.1 w/o 1.2.0, most of use are also
using tomcat as well and most of us skip releases. If it takes extra
time for no other benefit than to keep things neet, it is probably not
worth the effort.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn
]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:56 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'; Edgar Dollin
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Building struts-legacy (was: Re: Nightly build is
generating empty binary distribution file)
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Edgar Dollin wrote:
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:04:11 -0400
From
Does it cost anything to leave in the struts-legacy? If not could you
leave it until the 2.0 release?
Thanks
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:55 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: Re: Building struts-legacy
Thank you for getting this out the door. It makes it easier to justify
use of the software (although, I didn't have many complaints).
I have been using the struts db connection. Is there a link for the
legacy application in order to continue to use that part of the
application. The reason I
Edgar Dollin would like to recall the message, [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1
Final released.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking into the various methods of processing xml files and was
wondering why digester was used as opposed to jaxb.
Thanks in advance.
Edgar
it and/or applies it and
will post comments back to bugzilla.
David
From: Edgar Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Code Submissions
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:17:39 -0500
Is there a feedback loop on code submissions
As you are aware, there is a lot of good, general purpose, code in struts.
I have been taking code and modifying it for my own uses. I thought this
would be worth a 1 minute discussion so I understand the issues. My main
issue is with clause 2. BTW clause three has a spelling error
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Dollin
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 12:08 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Struts 1.0.2, Nested 1.0 and Standard Tags 1.0.2
Has anyone gotten JSTL c:set to work with Struts nested:write.
I get a null pointer exception in NestedPropertyHelper line 174
Who said building architecture has deep parallels to computer science anyway
;-)?
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc;apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: [FRIDAY] Re: Struts taglib
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, V.
The number of missing attributes in the tag libraries is large enough to
consider
a change, especially since writing tag libraries is one of the most
pleasurable
parts of what we do ;-).
Edgar.
I do highly encourage the Struts committers to use XDoclet for TLD and
documentation generation
My apologies for not understanding this particular issue. There are some
liberties that by necessity need to be taken with the tag library
definitions, i.e. styleClass for class. I don't understand why someone
would care if there are 'excess' tags in the tag library. I would never
consider
I think XDoclet is cool, but the issue here is not extra tags -- it's
extra attributes. One of our primary design principles is that Struts
tags would only contain attributes that correspond to valid attribute
names (for that particular element) in HTML/4.01 -- whether the browser
ignores
I guess we have a difference of opinion.
I care about the tld's because they take time getting them correct and I
have an explosion of entries in my projects. Also, the struts tld's (at
least in 1.0.2) are missing attributes. HTML and all the other languages we
use are hard enough to learn
17 matches
Mail list logo
