First of all, thanks for the votes peoples.
Need to confirm something and ask opinions on another before I scuttle
the codebase...
(need three +1's or 0's, or some -1's with explanations if you please) ...
1) The nested system is going into the main source tree (not contrib)?...
2) The TLD. Th
Arron Bates wrote:
>
> First of all, thanks for the votes peoples.
>
> Need to confirm something and ask opinions on another before I scuttle
> the codebase...
> (need three +1's or 0's, or some -1's with explanations if you please) ...
Hey, you're a committer now, and entitled to exercise you'
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Arron Bates wrote:
> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:54:42 +1100
> From: Arron Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Pre Nested Extension Commi
Hello Arron,
Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 4:54:42 PM, you wrote:
AB> First of all, thanks for the votes peoples.
AB> Need to confirm something and ask opinions on another before I scuttle
AB> the codebase...
AB> (need three +1's or 0's, or some -1's with explanations if you please) ...
AB> 1)
>
>
>I'm not quite ready for that yet ... how about in contrib first?
>
No offense, but what's to be "ready" for?...
It's tested against your multi-app stuff. All works a treat, and being
used by tons of happy campers.
Or I can just wait until you've played with it...
>Remember that all the s
Oleg V Alexeev wrote:
>One point to make it one, because of all nested tags are extends tags
>from different taglibs and use its own internal logic, common for all
>nested tags. And another point is a little question about adding of
>"nested logic" to the existing tags against of new taglib cre
Oleg V Alexeev wrote:
>AB> Making it one with the current library?...
>AB> It "can", but so can the html library. But for many reasons I go against
>AB> it. One, the simple fact that they're all working off the same basic
>AB> premise, the same relationships that the html tags work off of. So i
Oleg V Alexeev wrote:
> Good. So, can you create mirror of existing tags with "nested" features
> with intention to merge "base" and "nested" tags together? If yes,
> then we don't need to support two different brunches of tags with
> similar code.
The existing tags are working quite well, and th
>
>
>I think the real proof of concept was when the nesting extension
>continued to work well after the multiapp changes.
>
It was a non-event because you guys managed to separate the tags and
such (let's call them "view" components), from everything else (the
servlet etc. Lets for naming sake,
Hello Arron,
Thursday, January 17, 2002, 7:46:23 AM, you wrote:
AB> Oleg V Alexeev wrote:
>>One point to make it one, because of all nested tags are extends tags
>>from different taglibs and use its own internal logic, common for all
>>nested tags. And another point is a little question about
10 matches
Mail list logo
