Which is why I believe there should be an all in one distro as well as the
> separate pieces.
>
> David
>
>
>
> >From: "Edgar P. Dollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "'Struts Developers List&#x
Which is why I believe there should be an all in one distro as well as the
separate pieces.
David
From: "Edgar P. Dollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Inte
ce so that by itself it makes a difference. Not everyone
wants to roll there own.
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:00 AM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Interesting Bug Fact
>
ore' releases
then please do it!
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 21 March 2003 06:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Interesting Bug Fact
>well, i'm assuming that releases of the Struts core library would no longer
>have
well, i'm assuming that releases of the Struts core library would no longer
have to wait on fixes and upgrades to the JSP tags. it would also help in
dispelling the seemingly frequent perception that Struts is just for those
using JSPs.
Yep, I agree.
David
___
David said:
> Can you explain why? Having the JSP tags in the Struts distro doesn't
seem
> to hurt you if you don't use JSPs.
well, i'm assuming that releases of the Struts core library would no longer
have to wait on fixes and upgrades to the JSP tags. it would also help in
dispelling the seemi
Can you explain why? Having the JSP tags in the Struts distro doesn't seem
to hurt you if you don't use JSPs.
David
From: "Nathan Bubna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List&qu
David Graham said:
...
> It would benefit Struts to move the tags to a separate distro (there
should
> probably still be an all-in-one distro too).
...
It would also *greatly* please those of us who prefer to use Struts without
using JSPs.
Nathan Bubna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e tags to a separate distro (there should
> probably still be an all-in-one distro too).
>
> David
>
>
>
> >From: "Edgar P. Dollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "'Struts Developers List'
st'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Interesting Bug Fact
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:07:28 -0500
I would like to add an observation to this 'fact'. The tags have taken
a huge hit due to the complexity tomcat added with 'pooled' tags. The
pooling broke all the ta
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 10:08, James Mitchell wrote:
> Actually, I'm surprised that its *only* 35%. By going
> through the custom tags and writing cactus tests for them, I
> seem to be swinging back and forth (with each tag I tackle)
> on an emotional pendulum of frustration, enlightenment, an
I would like to add an observation to this 'fact'. The tags have taken
a huge hit due to the complexity tomcat added with 'pooled' tags. The
pooling broke all the tags resulting in a high level of bug reporting.
IMO it highlights the importance of the tag library to struts, at least
until JSF is
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 10:08, David Graham wrote:
> I just did a quick bug search and roughly 35% of Struts' total bugs have
> been reported against the "Custom Tags" category. I think this highlights
> the difficulty of writing custom tags and supports a move to separate Struts
> distributions
13 matches
Mail list logo
