+1
OSS community needs your power! :-)
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
P.S. If *really* needed , see this below and follow:
# To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:50:45 +0800
(Subject: RE: Resource Bundle Prototyping)
"Andrew Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stay awhile, stay forever!
-Original Message-
From: zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 09:17
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Resource Bundle Prototyping
pls remove my email from this email list
-Original Message-
From: Tetsuy
pls remove my email from this email list
-Original Message-
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Resource Bundle Prototyping
Already done.
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 09:04:00 ÄúдµÀ£º
>adam kramer wrote:of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~
>> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
>>
>>>Has there been any discussion of allowing resource bundles to inherit
>>>properties from other resource bundles? For the project I am working
>>>on, it would
adam kramer wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Has there been any discussion of allowing resource bundles to inherit
properties from other resource bundles? For the project I am working
on, it would be nice if we had one resource bundle with
application-level properties and also modu
Already done.
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:00:10 +0100
(Subject: RE: Re: Resource Bundle Prototyping)
"PILGRIM, Peter, FM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we remove this spam trap us
> Subject: Re: Re: Resource Bundle Prototyping
>
>
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by
> the Internet Service. To view the original message content,
> open the attached message. If the text doesn't display
> correctly, save the attachment to di
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Resource Bundle Prototyping
>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
> > Has there been any discussion of allowing resource bundles to inherit
> > properties from other resource bundles? For the projec
The main move regarding resource bundles is to use the
commons-resources package (which is still in the "sandbox").
There has been some discussion about commons-resources on the Commons
Dev mailing list lately. This post by Martin Cooper
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=10
ould be beneficial.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Resource Bundle Prototyping
> At 12:01 -0400 8/6/03, Sgarlata Matt w
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
> Has there been any discussion of allowing resource bundles to inherit
> properties from other resource bundles? For the project I am working
> on, it would be nice if we had one resource bundle with
> application-level properties and also module-specific
adam kramer wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Joe Germuska wrote:
I'm pretty sure this was an explicit design intention, although the
main reason may have been to make backwards compatibility more
manageable (or maybe not -- I can't cite any place where this was
discussed; I just have vague recollecti
At 12:30 -0400 8/6/03, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Or did you mean I'm not modularizing my app well? Maybe so, but I still
think a notion of a Struts "application" could be beneficial.
No, I meant nothing like that.
IMHO, the conceptual issue is that there seems to be no
notion of a Struts "application"
At 12:01 -0400 8/6/03, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Good point! I ran originally ran into the resource bundle problem a long
time ago, and forgot that there are other application-wide settings that
would be nice to inherit from module to module.
1) Declarative Exception Handling () - in my application,
ea
ment. It would also be flexible enough
to accomodate users with different needs.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: Resour
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Joe Germuska wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this was an explicit design intention, although the
> main reason may have been to make backwards compatibility more
> manageable (or maybe not -- I can't cite any place where this was
> discussed; I just have vague recollections). From re
16 matches
Mail list logo
