hi ,all:
how can I send my questions to all of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~
mqg
- SOUVENIR --- .
| Souvenir of China |
| A Good Place for You |
`--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -'
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--- Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
> > and the action would always forward to that forward? In that case,
> > you could count on using the first one.
>
> Just thinking that if an anonymous/default ActionForward were
hi ,all:
how can I send my questions to all of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~
mqg
- SOUVENIR --- .
| Souvenir of China |
| A Good Place for You |
`--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -'
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
At 18:18 -0700 8/8/03, Steve Raeburn wrote:
I don't think that you could rely on the ActionForwards being returned in
the same order each time, so forwarding to the first one found would not be
guaranteed to work.
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
and the action wo
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 9, 2003 3:56 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
>
>
> >
> > If Action actually does something useful, coul
--- Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I'm back. Now where were we...
>
> What you're suggesting is this?
>
> type="o.a.s.actions.SuccessAction">
>
>
>
> type="o.a.s.actions.SuccessAction"
> parameter="oops">
>
>
>
> I honestly don
t play ball.
>
>I haven't touched Action...yet ;-)
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addit
t play ball.
>
>I haven't touched Action...yet ;-)
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addit
> I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
> and the action would always forward to that forward? In that case,
> you could count on using the first one.
Just thinking that if an anonymous/default ActionForward were allowed, then
it could also be useful for other actions
t play ball.
>
>I haven't touched Action...yet ;-)
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addit
t play ball.
>
>I haven't touched Action...yet ;-)
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addit
t play ball.
>
>I haven't touched Action...yet ;-)
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addit
Maverick directly supports the idea that a command may have only one
destrintation, and then streamlines its behavior. So we have some
precedent under the "great minds" theory =:0)
ActionMapping.findForwards only brings back local forwards. So the
"DefaultAction" could just forward to the firs
; From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
>
>
> > I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
> > and the action wou
At 16:51 -0700 8/8/03, David Graham wrote:
I'd like to get your thoughts (and others) on my proposal at the beginning
of this message. In short, we wouldn't use the parameter attribute nor
would we define "success" as the only correct forward name. SuccessAction
would forward to the first that's
PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 8, 2003 4:51 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
>
>
> --- Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, I'm back. Now where were we...
> >
> > What
16 matches
Mail list logo
