I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
and the action would always forward to that forward? In that case,
you could count on using the first one.
Just thinking that if an anonymous/default ActionForward were allowed, then
it could also be useful for other actions.
Action...yet ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
Action...yet ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm back. Now where were we...
What you're suggesting is this?
action path=/myAction
type=o.a.s.actions.SuccessAction
forward name=success path=/myPage.jsp
/action
action path=/myOtherAction
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 9, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
If Action actually does something useful, could we go crazy and default
the
type as well
At 18:18 -0700 8/8/03, Steve Raeburn wrote:
I don't think that you could rely on the ActionForwards being returned in
the same order each time, so forwarding to the first one found would not be
guaranteed to work.
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
and the action
hi ,all:
how can I send my questions to all of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~
mqg
- SOUVENIR --- .
| Souvenir of China |
| A Good Place for You |
`-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -'
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
and the action would always forward to that forward? In that case,
you could count on using the first one.
Just thinking that if an anonymous/default ActionForward were allowed,
hi ,all:
how can I send my questions to all of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~
mqg
- SOUVENIR --- .
| Souvenir of China |
| A Good Place for You |
`-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -'
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action...yet ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
Action...yet ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
Action...yet ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 8, 2003 8:36 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
and the action would always forward to that forward? In that case,
you
Maverick directly supports the idea that a command may have only one
destrintation, and then streamlines its behavior. So we have some
precedent under the great minds theory =:0)
ActionMapping.findForwards only brings back local forwards. So the
DefaultAction could just forward to the first
At 16:51 -0700 8/8/03, David Graham wrote:
I'd like to get your thoughts (and others) on my proposal at the beginning
of this message. In short, we wouldn't use the parameter attribute nor
would we define success as the only correct forward name. SuccessAction
would forward to the first forward
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 8, 2003 4:51 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm back. Now where were we...
What you're suggesting
16 matches
Mail list logo
