ED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
>
> Yup I read it...
>
> I also read an article on it at
> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-11-2002/jw-1129-jsf.html
>
> But, my question is, how long before it will be ready for use?
There
List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
>
> By considering complcated GUI, we are planning to move to Swing
> Applications, which are deployed using "WEB START".
> Our idea is to use a controller to Navigate between Swing Application
the user interface on the server, allowing the
application developer to focus on application code.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:17
To: Craig R. McClanahan
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
So the components are
, December 02, 2002 11:22 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
The JSF Spec is a MUST READ for serious web application developers.
There is a lot of stuff going on and it will seriously effect the way
you develop and think
g List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
The JSF Spec is a MUST READ for serious web application developers.
There is a lot of stuff going on and it will seriously effect the way
you develop and think about web applications.
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 10:03 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
>>"Have you got an alternative suggestion for how to build complicated
>>UIs
for a web browser *without* using client side JavaScript?"
Flash
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Andrew Hill wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:02:34 +0800
> From: Andrew Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sub
approaches only,
or more generic than that?
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 09:18
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Jonathan Holloway wrote:
> Date: Fri
, 2002 11:18 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Jonathan Holloway wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:28:39 -
> > From: Jonathan Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Jonathan Holloway wrote:
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:28:39 -
> From: Jonathan Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Complicated Web Interfaces?
> > > I've also looked at the monkey-struts example as well but that seems
to
> > > lack the
> > > creation of objects in these lists, which doesn'
articular reason why this method is preferred over the
Model 2X approach?
Jon.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 November 2002 19:22
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
(Waiting for the turkey to be ready
iling List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
>
> Ok fair enough but surely the issue of embedding all this javascript
> In my html is reversing the whole embedding presentation logic within
> business logic? Surely embedding javascript in a JSP is j
Nested tags made struts work for me.
Thanks
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
> It solves my problem in theory at least : ) all I h
> It solves my problem in theory at least : ) all I have to
> work out now is how to maintain a tree in Struts :( I don't think the
> applet way is a very nice way of doing it.
Mate, here at the keyboard of monkeys, we aim to please...
http://www.keyboardmonkey.com/pilotlight
... and scroll to t
ruts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Complicated Web Interfaces?
> > I've also looked at the monkey-struts example as well but that seems
to
> > lack the
> > creation of objects in these lists, which doesn't look to be a
problem
> > to implement
> > but that
> > I've also looked at the monkey-struts example as well but that seems to
> > lack the
> > creation of objects in these lists, which doesn't look to be a problem
> > to implement
> > but that might be an oversight on my part : ) please let me know if I'm
> > wrong.
Have another play, click on "n
of the
app in case og Business Rule changes.
Affan
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Int
:) ?
Jonathan Holloway.
-Original Message-
From: Affan Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 November 2002 03:31
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Complicated Web Interfaces?
My comment between lines.
> Say I want to display two lists of objects and swap lists in and out
of
>
ve and I'm still pondering
> them as well
> myself but I just wanted to know whether it is possible to do this in
> Struts at present.
> From what I can see it is possible to create simple web based
> applications using
> Struts but I haven't come across any really c
reate simple web based
applications using
Struts but I haven't come across any really complicated web interfaces
yet using
Struts, has anybody got any ideas on this or any examples of web
applications that
are a little more compicated.
Many thanks,
Jon Holloway.
*---
21 matches
Mail list logo
