Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

Gemes Tibor wrote: >2002. október 14. 16:31 dátummal Eddie Bush ezt írtad: > >>Which browsers do you build against? ... and what functional areas do >>you find you still have to test in other browsers? I haven't even >> >I meant IE. Actually unlike most webdevelopers I know I do not use IE duri

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002. október 14. 16:31 dátummal Eddie Bush ezt írtad: > Which browsers do you build against? ... and what functional areas do > you find you still have to test in other browsers? I haven't even I meant IE. Actually unlike most webdevelopers I know I do not use IE during the devel period. > c

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

Gemes Tibor wrote: > Sorry to say - it's 3.0.0-12 I'm running :-/ and it seems deficient to > >>me. I can do all things, unhindered in Mozilla, whereas there were some >>sites which flat did not work under Konqueror. I can't remember now >>which specific funcational areas I found lacking. I'll

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

> Sorry to say - it's 3.0.0-12 I'm running :-/ and it seems deficient to > me. I can do all things, unhindered in Mozilla, whereas there were some > sites which flat did not work under Konqueror. I can't remember now > which specific funcational areas I found lacking. I'll have to look > again

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

Gemes Tibor wrote: >>Konqueror ... doesn't. I'm sorry - I run KDE, but there's a *reason* I >> >Since version 3.0 it's OK imho. > Sorry to say - it's 3.0.0-12 I'm running :-/ and it seems deficient to me. I can do all things, unhindered in Mozilla, whereas there were some sites which flat did

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

> Konqueror ... doesn't. I'm sorry - I run KDE, but there's a *reason* I Since version 3.0 it's OK imho. Tib -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

Andrew Hill wrote: >IMHO you would be better served spending your time providing support for the >lynx browser... > LOL - ROFL ... Andrew, you made my night with that one!! I'm not saying you're wrong - I'm just saying I nearly busted a gut! >(*) Possible underexageration. The real figure is

Re: OT : javascript revival?

JavaScript can also offload processing of the server, thus increasing salability. Ex: Dependent drop down lists in Struts could be javascript arrays, no ping to server and a good practice. Many other examples and rich GUI. AOL 8 had Netscape 7 which is Mozilla 1, so there will be more modern b

RE: [OT] : javascript revival?

loser to 6. -Original Message- From: Michael Delamere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 23:50 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? Unfortunately in my case it really is wishful thinking! I hate netscape 4.7.x!!! It´s always the s

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

Konqueror ... doesn't. I'm sorry - I run KDE, but there's a *reason* I don't use Konqueror - it sucks. Maybe it will one day be better, but this is not that day :-) Anyone using that over Mozilla deserves what they get IMHO (they have the option - it's not like it's the only thing available

RE: [OT] : javascript revival?

time. -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 23:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? 99% of the javascript I use has to do with validating form fields. You don't need to know every detail of it to use it

Re: OT : javascript revival?

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Vincent Stoessel wrote: > Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:42:28 -0400 > From: Vincent Stoessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: OT : javascript rev

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

supporting netscape 4.7.x, there´s no choice really Regards, Michael - Original Message - From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:33 PM Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? My suggestion is to for

RE: [OT] : javascript revival?

t: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:22 PM Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? 99% of the javascript I use has to do with validating form fields. You don't need to know every detail of it to use it well. If you want to spend most of your time coding front end gui stuff then you should k

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

; >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? >Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:35:41 +0200 > >exactly! > >Perhaps, some javascript guru can tel

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

CTED]> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:22 PM Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? 99% of the javascript I use has to do with validating form fields. You don't need to know every detail of it to use it well. If you want to spend most of your time coding front end gui stuff then yo

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

ng List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Struts Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: OT : javascript revival? >Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:42:28 -0400 > >Maybe because I've done mostly server side stuff but it seems to me that >Javascript is more popular than ever. The mo

RE: OT : javascript revival?

Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 22:45 To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: OT : javascript revival? Nothing wrong with having the O'Reilly book on your desktop :-) -Original Message- From: Vincent Stoessel [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: OT : javascript revival?

Nothing wrong with having the O'Reilly book on your desktop :-) -Original Message- From: Vincent Stoessel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:42 AM Maybe because I've done mostly server side stuff but it seems to me that Javascript is more popular than ever.

OT : javascript revival?

Maybe because I've done mostly server side stuff but it seems to me that Javascript is more popular than ever. The mozilla project uses it with cool XUL for the interface. And now JSF and EL it seems to be creeping into my world. Ugh. I know the minimal amount of Javascript. What I want to know