RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Madel,Kurt wrote: > Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:49:26 -0400 > From: "Madel,Kurt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject

RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-08 Thread Madel,Kurt
What about JAAS? Kurt Madel Programmer, CSMi (703) 823-4300 ext. 170 -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:30 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles On Tue, 8 Oct 2002

RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
ted. That way, you can isolate the container dependencies into a very small adapter layer. Craig > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 14:49 > To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE:

RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: > Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 01:01:32 -0600 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles > &

RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Andrew Hill
e- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 14:49 To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew Hill wrote: > > My (exceedingly limited) understanding of CMA was

RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread David Graham
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles >Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 23:48:38 -0700 (PDT) > > > >On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew Hill wrote: > > > > >

RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew Hill wrote: > > My (exceedingly limited) understanding of CMA was that it was very container > specific. If so what approach do you recomend for an app (accessing ejbs) > which customers are to run in their own container, where at development time > one desnt know whi

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Eddie Bush
Andrew Hill wrote: >(Or tell em they can have any container so long as its Tomcat? (This would >be my choice if I was dictator for life ;->)) > LOL - It's not friday yet! (that was very good though :-) -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional com

RE: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Andrew Hill
nal Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 02:27 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Eddie Bush wrote: > Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:22:23 -0500 > From: Eddie Bush <[EMA

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Eddie Bush wrote: > Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:22:23 -0500 > From: Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Using CheckLogin t

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Eddie Bush
Oh - one more thing. Filters really are a lot more flexible in that they can be deployed with the application. I've heard of instances where hosting providers wouldn't configure realms for folks (nor would they do anything else that required a server config change) - and that is where a Filt

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Eddie Bush
The only "implementation differences" would be in the way you configure it. The use of it (from within your application) is governed by the spec, so there's not a lot of "wiggle room". The configuration, however, is not governed by the spec ... so how it is setup will certainly vary from con

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread David Graham
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles >Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:59:34 -0500 > >... or use container-managed authentication (CMA) :-) and place the burden >on the server itself.

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread Eddie Bush
struts to authenticate and are using a 2.3 > container, use the Filter approach. > > Dave > >> From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles >> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:43:41 -0400 >> >> There h

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread David Graham
sing a 2.3 container, use the Filter approach. Dave >From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Using CheckLogi

Re: Using CheckLogin tag from within tiles

2002-10-07 Thread James Mitchell
There have been many "best practices" published (media) and posted (users list) over the last year or so that, if followed, can/would elimiate these kinds of issues. By forcing all interactions with your webapp to go through your custom actions, you can keep your "check for session expire" code i